Posted on 10/20/2013 7:36:08 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Eyeballs herself is unacceptable, ya think?
So will Pelosi have to go through one of the exchanges to be treated by whatever doctor is still practicing? Will she be subjected to the death panels?
If not, what about “equal protection” in the Constitution?
I want the interviewers to ask Hillary! what she accomplished as First ‘Lady’, what she accomplished as a Senator and what she accomplished as SOS. I can tell you about the SOS.....she allowed 4 patriotic Americans to be murdered in Benghazi and she helped bring the Middle East to the brink of all out war amongst themselves.
Well, Nancy...you “deemed it passed” and now we are finding out what’s in it.
A Huge Turd Sandwich.
Glitches? What glitches. It is running like a clock.
Just a minor glitch. Another half a billion dollars will fix it but those evil Republicans are refusing to fund it. /sarc
As well all knew it would be Obamacare is a solution to a problem that didn’t exist. Therefore Obamacare itself is a brand new, BIG problem and will continue to be until it is either fully repealed or radically changed.
Good article on how it may die.
ABC news. Hm ...
Well now that they got the debt ceiling raised they now have plenty of money with which to fix the computer glitches — and pay other bribes.
“You have to eat the crap before you can tell it’s crap.” Right, Nancy? Isn’t that effectively what you told America?
Your existence is unacceptable.
Nancy, Section 84, Paragraph 6 of the Affordable Care Act states “glitches are acceptable”. If you had read the thing you would have known that.
-——tens of millions of more people will have access to affordable, quality health care.-——
Prima fascia evidence positively is that they do not have access. There is no access to the care.
She lacks the depth of knowledge to understand reality
She is a clueless California girl
I disagree. Her existence would be acceptable in a carnival Freak show.
Translation: we'll have to increase funding and give the government more power.
Wow! One of the Politburo dares criticize a low level employee of another member of the Poliitburo; not for a flawed policy, but for less than optimum execution.
I do not know where it comes from..I borrowed it a while back and am just now using it..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.