Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hecticskeptic; PeteB570
Where are the feminazis? I think she should have asked the judge if the problem could simply be solved by quietly breastfeeding the child while she sat listening to testimony with the other jurors….

Practical issues like nursing babies are why women were exempt from jury duty from the beginning of time until the 1970s in many states. It might seem odd that feminists at places like the American Civil Liberties Union led the fight to deny women the right to be excused from jury duty because of family responsibilities. But it's consistent with feminist goals, which are Marxist, rather than pro-female or pro-liberty.

The goal of requiring female jury duty—and combat duty—is to break open the family to the claws of the state. It's to make the household a temporary grouping, instead of an autonomous unit that governs itself, and to make every person, including small children, individually subject to state authority. This statist religion requires that no decision be too private to be subject to the review and intervention of the state. And that the state be subject to no one.

53 posted on 10/20/2013 12:41:19 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot

You nailed it! The contention that a nursing mother should simply hand over her infant to ... just about anyone ... so as to attend court is just another development of anti-family Marxist philosophy.

To Marxists, parents aren’t important to their children. Just anyone can take the child, at a moment’s notice. All it needs is a bottle and a place out of the rain. The care of children, the sick, and the elderly isn’t valuable to society. Yes, it sort of has to be done - or at least, we can’t just abandon too many too obviously - but it needs to be kicked downhill to the fewest, least competent workers, so that the State can better allocate the labor of women who were stupid enough to reproduce.

Plenty of soi-disant conservatives have a worldview just as inhuman and atomistic as the most doctrinaire Marxist.


85 posted on 10/20/2013 1:31:12 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("The heart of the matter is God's love. It always has been. It always will be."~Abp. Chaput)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: SamuraiScot
The goal of requiring female jury duty—and combat duty—is to break open the family to the claws of the state. It's to make the household a temporary grouping, instead of an autonomous unit that governs itself, and to make every person, including small children, individually subject to state authority. This statist religion requires that no decision be too private to be subject to the review and intervention of the state. And that the state be subject to no one.

I’m sure that there are many who would take issue with calling it a ‘goal’ and instead might simply call it unintended consequences of the effort to achieve gender equality……. but regardless, it certainly is a direct outcome and it highlights what happens when laws and culture conspire to push agendas that don’t hold family, marriage and life sacrosanct. Thanks for your thoughts on that…… they were both intelligent and sobering.

121 posted on 10/20/2013 5:33:08 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson