Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Security trumps privacy, EU court says
EU Observer ^ | 17.10.13 @ 17:44 | Benjamin Fox

Posted on 10/20/2013 3:21:22 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Ensuring protection against the fraudulent use of passports outweighs personal privacy concerns about mandatory fingerprinting, the European Union’s top court said Thursday.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on Thursday (17 October) that although the taking and storing of fingerprints for passports breached privacy and personal data rights, it did not breach the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and was in line with EU law.

Article eight of the Charter includes an explicit right to the protection of personal data, but the Luxembourg-based Court ruled that the infringement of privacy was justified because fingerprinting reduced fraud. …

Meanwhile, government ministers and MEPs in Brussels are currently scrutinizing plans unveiled by the European Commission to fingerprint anyone who enters the EU under its “smart borders” proposal at an estimated cost of over €1 billion. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eussr; fingerprints; privacy; security

1 posted on 10/20/2013 3:21:22 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Europe can kiss my ass.

As well as much of the ruling class of America that believes this.


2 posted on 10/20/2013 3:25:49 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Except that here the ruling class is more concerned with security from us than terrorists.


3 posted on 10/20/2013 3:28:26 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

1. too much freedom
2. move in terrorists
3. terrorism takes place
4. implement new ‘formerly’ unacceptable policies
5. don’t enforce them against known terrorist groups
6. enforce them against your own citizens
7. freedom abolished
8. job done


4 posted on 10/20/2013 3:42:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (People will retain the power to control the Government, or it will retain the power to control them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So they’re going to require Burqa-free photo ID and showing faces whenever ID is displayed... Or do only trigger fingers lose privacy?


5 posted on 10/20/2013 3:46:53 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ben Franklin:

“Those who are willing to give up a little freedom for a little security, wind up with neither freedom, nor security”


6 posted on 10/20/2013 4:28:31 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

“Security” means security for the ruling class; not the slave class. It is a sure bet that the ruling class is exempt from the “security” precautions....


7 posted on 10/20/2013 4:57:12 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of "gun free zones"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What else would a government rule?


8 posted on 10/20/2013 5:52:24 PM PDT by gotribe (Vladimir Putin is MY President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There is no personal security when there is no personal privacy.

Seems the Nazi party is alive and well in the EU.


9 posted on 10/20/2013 6:20:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That way of thinking, and those who made the decision, will last about as long as civilization does. I’d estimate no more than another year.


10 posted on 10/20/2013 6:41:31 PM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I guess the ‘mark of the beast’ will soon be okay too?


11 posted on 10/20/2013 9:50:25 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson