But the premise is, that if there is some factor that can be detected prenatally (e.g. uterine environment-- they say a pregnant woman's exposure to progesterone or to anabolic steroids can cause deviations in the male child she is carrying , for instance) would the pro-LGBT's be against selectively aborting the baby?
This author here is abortion-choice all the way, even if it expresses a lethal prejudice against the survival of "pre-homosexual" children. I think that's strange.
And repellent.
Just another excuse to treat human beings like property: Democrats did that with blacks in the 19th century and continued to do it to the unborn in the 20th century and beyond.
Repellant indeed.