Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfony1
Because you don't have a clue how senate races work in South Carolina.

It's not divide and conquer, since SC has a run-off election race for Senate. As does Texas.

In the initial vote of the primary, if no-one gets 50%+ of the vote, then it goes to a run-off. At that point, the top two vote getters run off against each other, so it's one on one.

Your abject ignorance of how things work leaves you in the awkward position of being completely ineffective.

It doesn't matter which challenger you support at the start. The more the merrier. Swamp him and either send him to a run-off, or make sure he doesn't make the run-off.

/johnny

44 posted on 10/21/2013 5:28:36 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

If Graham doesn’t win outright against the three dwarfs, then he’ll only have to win against ONE of them with the support of the two losing dwarfs.

So it appears that the inability of Conservatives to support the “best” Conservative candidate actually ensures that Graham will win.

I really hope I’m wrong here.

If so, I’ll send a few bucks accross the state line, but not a penny for Graham, though.


48 posted on 10/21/2013 5:55:17 PM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson