Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Ridge Pushes Back On Gay Issues In GOP With Plea For “Practical” Tolerance
buzzfeed.com ^ | October 23, 2013 | Chris Geidner

Posted on 10/24/2013 12:53:44 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2013 12:53:44 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Everyone’s evolving nowadays it seems. How trendy. The chickens clearly come after the eggs.


2 posted on 10/24/2013 12:55:26 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The anus does not equal the vulva — period.


3 posted on 10/24/2013 12:56:27 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Ridge showed his Democrat stripes long ago.


4 posted on 10/24/2013 12:57:34 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Tailgunner Joe

I wasn’t aware that the Tea Party had a position on homosexual marriage.


6 posted on 10/24/2013 1:00:50 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Can’t be tolerant as long as gays target religious freedom critics.


7 posted on 10/24/2013 1:02:39 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Pandering at its worth. Political suicide, in my view, but maybe Ridge isn’t interested in holding political office. Maybe he’s looking for another cabinet appointment, or an amb ass adorship.


8 posted on 10/24/2013 1:03:15 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
The anus does not equal the vulva — period.

Roger that. It's not nice to fool Mother Nature .... the consequences are a bitch. [warning: clicking on the link is beyond disgusting]

9 posted on 10/24/2013 1:03:18 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Curious.

“The anti-Tea Party approach”.

I have never - and I mean, NEVER - heard one word about homosexuals, what they want, what they do, and whether or not it is any of my business - at a Tea Party event.

TEA = Taxed Enough Already. That’s all it is.

Poor Ridge has no clue. “You know something is happening here but you don’t know what it is, do you, Mr. Ridge?”


10 posted on 10/24/2013 1:04:14 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Not that I read all that crap but......Our roots are conservative, but we should be far less — not even far less — we oughtta quit being judgmental.”
“...You may not agree with me on some of these social issues, but I want you to respect them and don’t make them the centerpiece of your political agenda. They shouldn’t be there, in my judgment.

11 posted on 10/24/2013 1:04:36 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Bush Homeland Security Chief Slams Tea Party Opposition To Immigration Reform - October 24, 2013 - “At the end of the day, I think we’re just flat, dead wrong on the issue. We’re not sending them back, I don’t know why we can’t reach a compromise. And, by the way, ‘compromise’ is not a dirty word in my lexicon, it’s part of the art of governing.”
12 posted on 10/24/2013 1:04:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The fact that I ignore them and let them do whatever they want in privacy seems pretty practical.


13 posted on 10/24/2013 1:05:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

He always looked just like Herbert Hoover, now he sounds like him too.


14 posted on 10/24/2013 1:06:41 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"Practical tolerance"?

Isn't that a Republican euphemism for fold-like-cheap-lawn-chairs to any and all demands, especially Democrat ones?

15 posted on 10/24/2013 1:09:17 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

If this fool thinks America can be successful by concentrating on fiscal issues alone, while we self-destruct morally, he has an unpleasant surprise coming.

If they want,GOPers can join up with perverts and celebrate their tolerance for doing so, but they’ll do it without me.


16 posted on 10/24/2013 1:11:01 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

ridge has always been a democrat under his costume.


17 posted on 10/24/2013 1:12:57 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

In addition, “Doctor” Gosnell did much of his damage on RinoRidge’s watch as PA Gov.


18 posted on 10/24/2013 1:13:03 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Impeach We Much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"'...they are far more tolerant than judgmental,' Ridge told BuzzFeed..."

This has absolutely nothing to do with tolerance. That Ridge thinks that it does proves that he has swallowed an entire vat of Leftist poison.

19 posted on 10/24/2013 1:13:30 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

I don ‘t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party”–when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.

It was a feeling that there was not a sufficient difference now between the parties that kept a majority of the voters away from the polls. When have we ever advocated a closed-door policy? Who has ever been barred from participating?

Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?

.- CPAC 1975


20 posted on 10/24/2013 1:13:37 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule the all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson