More examples (and a name: LTC Jack Rich @ Ft Campbell) here:
Military Training Document: Anti-Christian SPLC a Trusted Source to Define 'Extremism'
If it happened and the military is automatically claiming that it didn’t instead of investigating it and charging the person who did it, then it by definition can’t be a lone wolf thing. And even if it was a lone wolf thing it is extremely problematic that any person would believe they could get away with this. As with the IRS thing, specific orders may never be given from the top, but the top creates an environment where everybody knows what will be rewarded and what will be punished. We just got done seeing an Obamacare call center worker get fired because she honestly answered the questions that were asked of her. Not long before that we saw a man who reported problems with the Benghazi investigation get demoted. We’ve seen the military purged of any top commanders who crossed Obama. We saw Michael Hastings die in a car explosion after he worked on an expose’ of John Brennan. We’ve seen the military court-martial (or threaten to; I can’t remember if they went through with it) a guy who posted anti-Obama comments on Facebook. Others on this thread have pointed out how the military has been caught before, warning against Catholics and evangelicals. We just saw a CAtholic priest being told he would be arrested if he voluntarily conducted services on a base where the soldiers have no way to get to services off-base. We saw 18 Navy Seals killed in what seems to be a coordinated attack after it was revealed that Team 6 had done the Bin Laden raid - and we saw an imam say over the dead bodies that they would rot in Hell...
I think there is practically a snowball’s chance that this was just a lone wolf thing, given all the other stuff we’ve been seeing. This regime has ALWAYS operated by threats against anybody who would try to stand againt them. It is their native language, just as lies are the native language of them and the dark lord they serve.
Yes, let’s get some names. But I’m sure you can see why these guys would hesitate to do that. They’ve seen the same things we’ve seen in full public view. I hope that they realize, though, that once their names become public as well as the name of the perpetrator, any retaliation against them will be discernible to the public. Not that the military will do anything about it; they will do to these whistleblowers exactly what they did to LTC Terry Lakin. And not that Congress will do anything about it; they will do the exact same thing they did to the people who demoted the Benghazi whistleblower. But the people will know. And that is the choice these guys face. What would you do?
The combination of the article for this post (where the military denied that the event happened) and the article somebody else just gave (where the military said those events are isolated instances) shows that the military is both claiming that the event happened and that it didn’t. How does that work, if the military is being truthful?
More examples (and a name: LTC Jack Rich @ Ft Campbell) here:
Military Training Document: Anti-Christian SPLC a Trusted Source to Define 'Extremism'