Once again, if the dog was approaching the one officer in a threatening manner, why did the officer that the dog was allegedly approaching/threatening not shoot the dog?
Why would the officer who was threatened, which the dog was allegedly approaching, not be the one to shoot the dog?
Why would the officer who was not threatened shoot the dog?
LOL !! Lets see ya dance on the head of pin some more....
I give this a 9 on the hooking hoot scale...
The article does not say which officer shot the dog. I’m going by the facts presented in the article. Unless you’re reading a different source in addition to this one, then you’re adding to the known facts by those you’ve found someplace or other.
That’s why you owe me 60,000.