And how exactly was the dog “about to bite” the officers considering the dog was shot *in the back of the head*?
Mr. zin explained all this!
He said the cops separated because this is the tactical way things are done, and the cop that was allegedly threatened decided not to shoot the dog, however the cop that was not threatened shot the dog. But the cop that shot the dog in the back of the head like the article said, did not actually shoot the dog in the back of the head, but actually shot the dog on the rear side of the head...
See, perfectly clear...xzins said so!