Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScottinVA
Two things:

(1) There is no way that Obama and the Clintons would be campaigning there unless McAwful really needed them. The fact that they're there/coming demonstrates that McAwful's own polling shows it to be very close.

(2) If you read the article, you will find that the Libertarian candidate is NOT harming Cuccinelli that much. McAwful would still have a 2-point edge if Sarver wasn't there. Some Libertarian-supporters are really just liberal-lite - they will not support a Pro-Life, Anti-Sodomite Normalizer (my own term, which I think accurately describes our view on the issue) candidate.

56 posted on 10/30/2013 7:46:11 AM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreatOne

Sarver = Sarvis


58 posted on 10/30/2013 7:47:26 AM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson