To: jazusamo
There being no severalbility clause, how is it the law can stand in whole.
It would have to be summarily struck down.
24 posted on
11/01/2013 10:41:43 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Vendome
I agree but they all have seemed to ignore that fact. There was a lot of talk about that right after it was jammed down our throats but I haven’t heard a thing about it in some time.
36 posted on
11/01/2013 10:49:07 AM PDT by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: Vendome
Is birth control and abortion part of the law or part of a hhs rule permitted by the law? if the latter, then perhaps the rule can be ruled unconstitutional while not tripping the law and the severability clause... IANAL...
49 posted on
11/01/2013 10:52:19 AM PDT by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To: Vendome
There being no severalbility clause, how is it the law can stand in whole. It would have to be summarily struck down.
IF the present court system actually followed the written law instead of what they personally feel is right.
69 posted on
11/01/2013 11:28:19 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Vendome
I think that it was the regulation that was struck.
136 posted on
11/06/2013 9:47:12 PM PST by
RobbyS
(quotes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson