“Expand the law” is such a vague thing to ask. That’s the closest answer they offered that would have been equivalent to “fixing the problems with the law.”
It’s interesting how even among Republicans, many more want to just repeal it, and don’t want a Republican replacement.
Among independents, more of them want to repeal it than want to keep it. It’s the overwhelming amount of Democrats that push the overall non-repeal answer up. It doesn’t help that 79% of Democrats are for the law while only 71% of Republicans are against it. The Dems’ enthusiasm for it is stronger than the Repubs’ distaste for it.
The majority of enrollees thus far are actually individuals signing up for Medicaid.
Wait for those Democrats have to start paying for it.
What’s a “Republican replacement”? Romneycare, which is essentially the same thing at the state level? Obamacare-lite, like some RINOs are proposing? “Republican” is tossed in there to reduce the results.
And “expanding” is so much more pleasant-sounding than “nationalize”, “socialize”, or, what the Obamas of the world really want—”communize”.
Most of the time, polling companies oversample democrats. I learned that listening to Rush take apart poll after poll.