Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ican'tbelieveit

First and foremost, hold the “judge” accountable for issuing the search warrant on such flimsy probable cause.


3 posted on 11/05/2013 5:32:02 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Judges have become nothing but a rubber stamp for police. Time and again, stories of cops getting warrants on very flimsy evidence.

Why in the world would doctors agree to do this? We know cops are unethical. Now doctors too?


10 posted on 11/05/2013 5:40:17 AM PST by LevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

The judge should

1) be personally liable for punitive damages

2) lose his job

3) be required to think of a different reason every day for a month why someone might clench his buttocks, and stand at the busiest corner in town with that reason on a placard.

Apply that to the police too.

The doctors, malpractice suit and assault charges. A colonoscopy is not a risk-free procedure - there are reactions to the anesthesia, and the risk of perforation of the intestinal wall. The police might have snowed them with “he’s probably got 300 condoms filled with heroin/cocaine in his gut. If they burst he’ll die. You’re saving his life!”


40 posted on 11/05/2013 7:30:02 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson