Skip to comments.
Is This Woman a War Criminal or a Regular Old Jilted Wife?
New York Magazine ^
| 11/5
| Kat Stoeffel
Posted on 11/05/2013 10:18:49 AM PST by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: nickcarraway
The mistress easily noticed the powder (she suffered only a thumb burn), and complained to police, who took no action. But her mailman alerted the the Postal Service, which had videotaped Bond spreading the chemicals on 24 different occasions. Huh??
2
posted on
11/05/2013 10:23:23 AM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
To: nickcarraway
She stole deadly controlled chemicals and tried to use them to kill a person. Sounds like a chemical weapon attack to me.
was sentenced to six years in prison, three times the sentence she would have received if the state had pursued the case
You only get two years for attempted murder in Pennsylvania? Remind me to go there if I need to almost kill somebody.
3
posted on
11/05/2013 10:25:17 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: nickcarraway
As if there are no laws on the books to cover this, they resort to treaties?
To: nickcarraway
So if I spray a cotton field with parathion and some bum that was sleeping in the cotton field gets sick I’m violating a chemical weapons treaty? If I have a couple of gallon of O-Ethyl O-2-diisopropylaminoethyl methylphosphonite (which is NOT poisonous) am I in violation of a chemical weapons treaty?
5
posted on
11/05/2013 10:25:59 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
Mix it with readily-available sulfur then yes, I would say you’ve got yourself a weapons-grade problem on your hands.
6
posted on
11/05/2013 10:28:07 AM PST
by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: Dalberg-Acton
As if there are no laws on the books to cover this, they resort to treaties?Apparently, the feds got involved because the Philly police were not interested in pursuing a case as unimportant as attempted murder.
7
posted on
11/05/2013 10:28:32 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
She stole deadly controlled chemicals and tried to use them to kill a person. Sounds like a chemical weapon attack to me. "was sentenced to six years in prison, three times the sentence she would have received if the state had pursued the case"
You only get two years for attempted murder in Pennsylvania? Remind me to go there if I need to almost kill somebody.
**************************
Well said.
8
posted on
11/05/2013 10:29:14 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: nickcarraway
What’s the big deal? LBJ sprayed a whole country with the color orange.
9
posted on
11/05/2013 10:30:13 AM PST
by
South Dakota
(shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
To: from occupied ga
Think of the opportunity this may represent to the anti-smoking Gnatzis!
“She assaulted me with a chemical fog from her ciggy-butt!”
10
posted on
11/05/2013 10:31:01 AM PST
by
Don W
(Know what you WANT. Know what you NEED. Know the DIFFERENCE!)
To: from occupied ga
Don’t forget dihydrogen monoxide. That stuff can desolve battleships and kill you as well. And it’s freely available. I think it should be regulated.
11
posted on
11/05/2013 10:32:16 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: nickcarraway
If I remember correctly, this is the case that, if the court cites international chem weapons law, will have gone a long way to nullify US or state law and bring us much closer to losing our sovereignity to the UN.
This female’s time in the slammer is irrelevant compared to what this means for us as a nation.
12
posted on
11/05/2013 10:34:51 AM PST
by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: dead
The Feds are arguing that every time a treaty is signed, the Congress obtains all the authority it needs for enabling legislation,
regardless of any other Constitutional requirements or limitations.In this case, the Feds are claiming authority over an individual's actions when normally such actions are solely within the purview of the states and not the Federal government.
If the Senate were to approve the recent arms trafficking treaty, they could claim the Congress can restrict firearms in any manner irrespective of the 2nd Amendment.
This is a massive power grab by the Feds and the ruling class.
13
posted on
11/05/2013 10:36:43 AM PST
by
pierrem15
(Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
To: nickcarraway
"three times the sentence she would have received if the state had pursued the case."
Seems to me the difference is that she sent this in the mail. Making it a federal crime. If Ms. Bond wanted to kill her, she should have spread the chemical over her Victoria Secret catalog.
To: pierrem15
Good point, there's more at stake here.
None of this would have happened, apparently, if the Philly police had any interest in doing their job in the first place.
15
posted on
11/05/2013 10:46:25 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: rarestia
Mix it with readily-available sulfur then yes, I would say youve got yourself a weapons-grade problem on your hands. If I mix it with sulfur, I wouldn't have any problems at all. I'd probably be dead.
16
posted on
11/05/2013 10:49:34 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: SkyDancer
I knew a few people personally who have died from prolonged exposure to dihydrogen monoxide.
I myself have had coughing fits and gagging from minute inhalation of the substance.
17
posted on
11/05/2013 10:52:06 AM PST
by
SpinnerWebb
(In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
To: from occupied ga
So if I spray a cotton field with parathion and some bum that was sleeping in the cotton field gets sick Im violating a chemical weapons treaty? If your intent was to spray the field, then no. If your intent was specifically to cause harm to a human through the use of toxic chemicals, then perhaps.
18
posted on
11/05/2013 11:01:48 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: nickcarraway
http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/02/22/us.scotus.toxic.love/index.html
She's a microbiologist, and a very pissed off woman.
19
posted on
11/05/2013 11:02:22 AM PST
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: PapaBear3625; from occupied ga
I think it depends on whether the bum was eating your cotton.
20
posted on
11/05/2013 11:07:51 AM PST
by
WayneS
(No problem is so great that it cannot be made worse by a "progressive" solution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson