To: nickcarraway
So if I spray a cotton field with parathion and some bum that was sleeping in the cotton field gets sick I’m violating a chemical weapons treaty? If I have a couple of gallon of O-Ethyl O-2-diisopropylaminoethyl methylphosphonite (which is NOT poisonous) am I in violation of a chemical weapons treaty?
5 posted on
11/05/2013 10:25:59 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
Mix it with readily-available sulfur then yes, I would say you’ve got yourself a weapons-grade problem on your hands.
6 posted on
11/05/2013 10:28:07 AM PST by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: from occupied ga
Think of the opportunity this may represent to the anti-smoking Gnatzis!
“She assaulted me with a chemical fog from her ciggy-butt!”
10 posted on
11/05/2013 10:31:01 AM PST by
Don W
(Know what you WANT. Know what you NEED. Know the DIFFERENCE!)
To: from occupied ga
Don’t forget dihydrogen monoxide. That stuff can desolve battleships and kill you as well. And it’s freely available. I think it should be regulated.
11 posted on
11/05/2013 10:32:16 AM PST by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: from occupied ga
So if I spray a cotton field with parathion and some bum that was sleeping in the cotton field gets sick I’m violating a chemical weapons treaty? If your intent was to spray the field, then no. If your intent was specifically to cause harm to a human through the use of toxic chemicals, then perhaps.
18 posted on
11/05/2013 11:01:48 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson