Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk

He said it wouldn’t produce sexual side effects, just the inability to reproduce.

After 50, given the choice between that and death, it would be presented as an option, not a mandate.


11 posted on 11/05/2013 12:19:03 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Beowulf9

“He said it wouldn’t produce sexual side effects, just the inability to reproduce.”

That’s not what I’ve read and heard over the years. I don’t beieve it for a minute. I think this makes even less sense than removing breasts as a preventative measure. At least with breast removal you can still have sex.


13 posted on 11/05/2013 12:43:28 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson