Posted on 11/06/2013 1:59:55 PM PST by Kaslin
In response to the curious statement in Obamacare website source code: "You Have No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" one reader wondered if that was just "standard disclosure practice".
If so, then why didn't Cheryl Campbell, senior vice president of CGI Federal Inc., the company that built the Obamacare health care exchange website, simply say so?
The reason is now apparent. The website design is a clear breach of privacy.
Clear Breach of Privacy
The Foundry reports HealthCare.gov Users Warn of Security Risk, Breach of Privacy.
Justin Hadley logged on to HealthCare.gov to evaluate his insurance options after his health plan was canceled. What he discovered was an apparent security flaw that disclosed eligibility letters addressed to individuals from another state.
Hadley wrote to Heritage on Thursday night and also contacted the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers HealthCare.gov, as well as elected officials in his state. He has yet to hear back from HHS, even though HealthCare.gov still displays the personal information of the South Carolina residents on his account.
Dougall said he was able to register on HealthCare.gov, but decided not to sign up for insurance. “The plans they offered were grossly expensive and didn’t provide the level of care I have now,” he said.
After learning of the privacy breach, Dougall spent Friday evening trying to contact representatives from HealthCare.gov to no avail; he spent an hour waiting on the telephone and an online chat session was unhelpful.
“I want my personal information off of that website,” Dougall said.
Security Risk
Last week, the Associated Press disclosed a government memo revealing the “high” security risk for HealthCare.gov. Those concerns surfaced at Wednesday’s hearing with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who claimed the system was secure.
Heritage cyber-security expert Steven Bucci, director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, said users of HealthCare.gov are leaving their personal information unsecured.
“Once it goes out over the system, it is vulnerable,” Bucci said. “There appears to have been a singular lack of concern for security. The site needs to receive and transmit sensitive personal information, yet it has less than state of the art security.”
Memo Raises Security Concerns
Let's dig a little deeper. Please consider Memo raises security concerns about government health website
The nation’s top health official tells lawmakers ‘I’m responsible’ for the problems with the launch of Healthcare.gov.
Defending President Barack Obama’s much-maligned health care overhaul in Congress, his top health official was confronted Wednesday with a government memo raising new security concerns about the trouble-prone website that consumers are using to enroll.
The document, obtained by The Associated Press, shows that administration officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were concerned that a lack of testing posed a potentially “high” security risk for the HealthCare.gov website serving 36 states. It was granted a temporary security certificate so it could operate.
Security issues are a new concern for the troubled HealthCare.gov website. If they cannot be resolved, they could prove to be more serious than the long list of technical problems the administration is trying to address.
“You accepted a risk on behalf of every user ... that put their personal financial information at risk,” Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., told Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius during questioning before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Sebelius Says "American's Deserve Better"
“So let me say directly to these Americans, you deserve better. I apologize.”, said Sebelius.
That's a start. Not many politicians apoligise when they make a mistake. President Obama should try the same, first by firing Sebelius. Second, and more importantly, Obama should offer his own apology, then reach out to Republicans and health care officials in an attempt to fix Obamacare. Better yet, he should start all over.
Both Bacus (Sr. Democrat) and Hatch (Sr. Republican) hit this HARD today at the hearings — as have others in other hearings and in the press.
Sebelius has been asked REPEATEDLY if she will shut the site down until it is secure and actually, well, even works. She always says NO!. This is an abominable and unforgivable breach of security of American free citizens. It cannot be tolerated. Surely an injunction could be placed to stop this travesty.
Sebelius let this cat out of the bag at today’s hearings. It is actually BETTER she says, to keep the live system up, because it helps them to identify other bugs, errors, unintended consequences, and flaws. This is TESTING, my dear citizens; TESTING which should be done with a dummy data base. She is leaving it UP and LIVE with YOUR PERSONAL DATA as an EXPEDIENT for TESTING! SHEESH! Does no one have the intestinal fortitude to go to a judge and shut it down? Does the House and Senate lack the intestinal fortitude in their oversight capacity to have it shut down??
Why are our elected Senators begging (as the most senior Hatch, Bacus, and others etc.) I mean just begging her to shut it down? Those august bodies HAVE to have the ability to make it so.
There are estimates that U. S. healthcare-related on-line traffic exceeds ONE TRILLION transactions daily. Something are innocuous requests like prescription renewals, but some are life-and-death decisions, like ordering a rare blood-type for a transfusion, or obtaining an organ for an emergency transplant.
The healthcare networks are incredibly complex and diverse, and rely on multiple paths between physician, patient and third parties.
The Obamacare website should be a walk in the park compared to the complicated web of information services needed to sustain a nationally-run healthcare system. If there are screwups now, people might get mad, but people probably won’t die.
In the execution phase of Obamacare, however, mistakes like those made with the website will result in innumerable negative medical consequences, including many deaths. Even minor delays and glitches will exact a huge bodycount.
This website is the canary in the coal mine. We cannot let this program proceed. We cannot accept this kind of incompetance when peoples’ lives are at stake.
Estimates by who?
Could be the motto for the whole Obama administration. But don't worry. Your most intimate and private details are safe with us.
Obviously we have reached the stage in the oppressive take over where the useful idiots are no longer useful. They have now been targeted for financial cyber attacks. Whether this was by design or not, is immaterial to the fact that oppression has always failed, and the useful idiots should have known that.
An apology from every single one of these Jackasses won’t help a person who has their identity stolen & used in bad ways.
That is a nightmare that lingers for years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.