Skip to comments.
Ted Cruz And Marco Rubio Reject Chris Christie As A Model For Winning The Latino Vote
RightWingNews.com ^
Posted on 11/08/2013 9:03:35 AM PST by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: cll
I agree wholeheartedly. I am of Hispanic Decent as most Spanish speakers descend from Spain, Hispaniola not from Rome Italy/ Latin. But above all I am American!
To: SoConPubbie
I asked in another post that someone name Christie’s opponent without going to Google to find out.
So far no answer.
Christie had no opposition to amount to anything. Democrats spent all their money on McAuliffe while Republicrats held back funds from Cuccinelli.
The Republicrats elected McAuliffe.
22
posted on
11/08/2013 9:40:33 AM PST
by
Venturer
(Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
To: 1010RD
2. Ditto the Senate, but in the big picture a RINO is better than a Democrat because once you gain a majority you control committees, assignments and the legislative agenda. All the stuff Reid does to us, we can now do to them.
3. We need a GOP President. Its that simple. A guy on our side of aisle is more likely to deal with us, than resist and fight us.
Romney would have done the same thing that he did in Massachusetts, destroy the GOP and any chance for GOP, much more, Conservative governance.
Just like he did in Massachusetts, Romney would have presided over the implementation of Gay Marriage, the reversal of the gains that the Pro-Life movement has made in the last two decades in this country, he would not have done anything material to remove Obamacare, quite the opposite, like he stated, I believe yesterday, he would have FORCED all 50 states to implement socialized medicine.
Since Romney was about one month away from implementing his own Carbon Tax Scheme, before he dropped it, I'd bet we'd get some sort of evil from him on this issue.
Given that Romney raised taxes on just about everything that moved in Massachusetts, it's a fair bet that we would not get any measurable tax-relief.
And finally, you'd get no smaller government with that Big-Government solution hack Mitt Romney.
What was your point with #3 and #4 above?
History, and Mitt Romney's record and policy positions don't support your contention.
23
posted on
11/08/2013 9:41:58 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
Kris Kristie Kreme Ping!
Warm. Soft. Words melt in your ear.
24
posted on
11/08/2013 9:42:39 AM PST
by
hadaclueonce
(dont worry about Mexico, put the fence around kalifornia.)
To: 1010RD
1. Perot.
And to that I would counter this: "Read my lips, no new taxes!" and a complete refusal to govern from a limited-government perspective.
Can there be any doubt that if GHB had continued to govern from a Ronald Reagan perspective that he wouldn't have completely routed Clinton, and there would have been no need, nor support for Perot?
25
posted on
11/08/2013 9:44:15 AM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: cll
I am Puerto Rican, which makes me an American, and I soundly reject the Latino label.My grand parents came from Sicily, I learned to speak, Italian, Latin, Spanish and German, am I a Latino Nazi? Just axin'.
26
posted on
11/08/2013 9:51:30 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(If I could...I would.)
To: 1010RD
I won't vote for a liberal(R) in the 2016 election. Thats the truth. You dont have to like the reality, but you do have to live it.
/johnny
To: 1010RD
McCain had a good chance of winning until 9/15 when Bushs treasury secretary effectively gave the election to Obama. After the conference in Washington, McCain made nice the rest of the campaign. He let Obama play the moderate rather than play up the Democrats obvious radicalism. My guess is that even when he was nominated the party had leaders told him to keep it toned down and that after the election they could work with the Democrats on the economic crisis. Palin did not fit in this strategy. Which is why they tried to shut her up and then after the election to discredit her. They are upset with Cruz because he has all her pizzaz and the Elitist credentials that she so totally lacks. They cant call him white trash because he, like Bill Clinton, and unlike Barack Obama, is super smart and has the academic record to prove it.
28
posted on
11/08/2013 9:54:06 AM PST
by
RobbyS
(quotes)
To: cll
You are, of course, aware that when they (media) mention "Latino Vote" they really, really mean ILLEGALS, don't you?
29
posted on
11/08/2013 9:55:39 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: Gaffer
Where would Democrats be without the voter support of criminals, liars and welfare beggars?
30
posted on
11/08/2013 9:59:02 AM PST
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: raybbr
Race Politics ....brought to you by the leader of race baiting in all forms....
31
posted on
11/08/2013 10:10:19 AM PST
by
caww
To: Venturer
You’re absolutely correct.....the election is being played hot and heavy on the “back burner” while we are kept occupied and under fire on “the front burner” until they are ready to “show and tell” what’s really in the pot.
32
posted on
11/08/2013 10:14:17 AM PST
by
caww
To: SoConPubbie
Oh yeah, hispanics are gonna fall all over themselves to vote for a fat, obnoxious white guy.
33
posted on
11/08/2013 10:16:02 AM PST
by
riri
(Plannedopolis-look it up. It's how the elites plan for US to live.)
To: 1010RD
I see that you are from Illinois, which helps me to understand your posts. You are surrounded by RINOs and obviously think that is the OK way to go.
Ted Cruz, or those like him, should be the future of GOP.
34
posted on
11/08/2013 10:39:05 AM PST
by
ohioman
To: 1010RD
There are several problems with the thinking here. First, we need a GOP Conservative POTUS.
35
posted on
11/08/2013 10:50:01 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
To: dfwgator
We need true believers and not actors who try to act like they think a conservative should act, without really believing in it....People can spot those phonies from a mile away.
__________________________________________________________
True, so very true. In any walk of life/any profession if you believe in what you’re doing/saying...you will be more successful than the phonies out there. And having some passion about what your doing/saying also helps convince people that YOU are the real deal.
36
posted on
11/08/2013 11:10:43 AM PST
by
conservaKate
(R got it wrong in 2012. We must get it right in 2014 & 2016.)
To: cll
You SHOULD feel that way. Sadly, in Scranton HS, one student interviewed every fellow student of PR descent. Among the dozens, only TWO thought of themselves as Americans first, and not Puerto Ricans. Very sad, but typical of the brainwashed masses who have been victimized by the culture, and government schools. Bob
37
posted on
11/08/2013 1:01:11 PM PST
by
alstewartfan
("If I had known last summer... I'd have never set my foot inside this bleak and bitter land." Al S)
To: RobbyS
Don’t absolve Bush himself. He didn’t have to go along, and destroy the free market to “save” it.
38
posted on
11/08/2013 1:02:48 PM PST
by
alstewartfan
("If I had known last summer... I'd have never set my foot inside this bleak and bitter land." Al S)
To: itsahoot
Show me, using the last elections voting and electoral numbers how to do that? GW Bush wasn’t conservative.
39
posted on
11/09/2013 4:48:54 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: ohioman
Absurd. Should isn’t will. I don’t like RINOs, but we have to live with them. Look at the political reality. RINOs are regular betrayers of the conservative cause because...wait for it...they’re RINOs, not conservatives.
They represent states or districts that aren’t monolithically conservative. Do the math. Be realistic. We’re not going to win this in a single fell swoop.
We have to hold the Congress for a Generation. You’re not going to overthrow more than a half century of indoctrination in government schools or programming via the media. But you can slowly turn the ship around. To do so you must find areas of common accord and agreement.
Take homosexual marriage and the latest push to get every sexual deviant a seat at the table. Push back with the Right of Conscience and the Right of Free Association. People can be bargained with. We lose when we don’t move the ball forward, particularly when the deal is all or nothing.
40
posted on
11/09/2013 4:54:11 AM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson