Breitbart’s coroner initially said - after looking at the medical records, according to protocols - that Breitbart had not seen a doctor in over a year. Breitbart’s father-in-law, in initial interviews, said that he did not know Andrew had any heart problems. It was after people started wondering at the timing of this that the stories started to change, and those stories grew like Pinnocchio’s nose over time. First they didn’t know of any heart problems, then they said he had moved his office so he didn’t have to walk so far, then they said he was taking heart meds (but there weren’t any in his system according to the autopsy), and eventually they said he had had a massive heart attack that had put him in the hospital for a couple weeks just 6 months earlier. None of it pans out with what the coroner said based on the medical records before there was any question about him being assassinated. The shifting stories on the part of family and friends - stories not corroborated by the medical record - suggest that the family was scared. It is totally consistent with the family knowing he was assassinated and realizing that Breitbart’s children were next unless they fell in line and did what Andrew’s killer wanted them to do.
It actually reminds me of something I know and have observed as a teacher: the kids who will come right out and tell you their parents are abusing them are NOT being abused. The kids who are being abused are the ones who will insist until they are blue in the face that the black eyes and broken bones were because they fell down the stairs or walked into a door. The more adamant they are, the more you know they are afraid. And in those cases you have to let the broken bones tell you what fearful, abused children will never let themselves tell you because they know they will be punished if they let out the secret.
The medical record told a different story than Breitbart’s loved ones’ shifting stories told.
Mark Gillar interviewed Joel Pollack after Breitbart’s death. Pollack affirmed the need to report on important stories, regardless of danger. When asked if he would report on Arpaio’s criminal investigation of fraud and forgery involving Obama’s BC and selective service registration, Pollack said he definitely would NOT. When asked why, he basically said that it wasn’t important enough - not big enough, like this tape. This tape was a dud; a criminal investigation involving the supposed POTUS wasn’t BIG enough?!
That is the behavior of a scared man.
That fear speaks much, much louder than any words.
Didn’t I already say you could save yourself the trouble of posting paragraphs of this nonsense in my direction? You’re not saying anything original that thousands of other kooks haven’t already plastered all over the internet. Repeating it doesn’t make it any more convincing.
Go get some proof, not theories, and then get back to me.