Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert

“I had a somewhat different view. Leno was being Devil’s Advocate. He was getting to the heart of the Cruz opposition and promoting the response. Rather than a detractor, I think maybe Leno is a Cruz fan. This was after all NBC, the DNC propaganda organ.”

Had he let Cruz speak without cutting him off with another gotcha, I would agree...but he didn’t. He kicked off a bunch of chain fire questions with complicated answers and kept cutting him off.


38 posted on 11/12/2013 5:57:32 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

I can agree with your point to a degree.

There is another important and probably governing factor, time

Leno, like Cavuto and even Rush sometimes presses the interview to get in all the points within the allotted time. Cruz made his points. He is a very, nay extremely, savvy interviewee. The goal is to limit the discussion to the main points and not spend a lot of time on unneeded garnishment.

Leno laid out the points rapid fire and Cruz provided rapid fire and directly on message response.

Unlike the Sebelius Congressional hearings, where she goes on and on eating up the very limited clock both Leno and Cruz completely understood the process.

In my view, both made outstanding performances


48 posted on 11/12/2013 6:47:08 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson