Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie

“...we want to call a convention for the purpose of limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.”

No, this is not the right way to go, you do NOT “limit” the Federal Government’s power...

You do however, want to “restore” the Federal government back to within the confines of its Constitutional limits and duties as enumerated in that document...Thats how you “limit” this Federal Government...

Either that, or hit the “Flush” lever, and start over, either option is acceptable in my book...

And a longshot to boot...


32 posted on 11/14/2013 2:06:15 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stevie_d_64

We disagree.

It is the perfect approach. If every state legislature passed different Article V resolutions, it might give our slippery congress an excuse to avoid calling a convention.

If the states use identical language, there is zero constitutional justification to not call a convention.

Once the delegates convene, they will be governed by their state issued commissions.

And yes, placing structural, federal limits on our consolidated government should be the purpose of amending the constitution.


35 posted on 11/14/2013 2:59:38 AM PST by Jacquerie (An Article V amendment convention is our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson