Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

The proper phrase is “just desserts”, not “just deserts.” I guess deserts are just in that they uniformly are harsh to everyone...

I am not so sure about the analysis of Obama’s motives. I have observed that liberals enamored with some socialist scheme are incapable of understanding that the scheme will not and cannot work. I remember, years ago, posting (on another forum) several reasons why a socialized health care scheme cannot work and does not work in countries that have it. Some liberal got mad at me, saying “But don’t you *want* everyone to have health care?” They could not understand that feelings on the issue, no matter how heartfelt, simply cannot make an unworkable scheme work. I believe Obama is in the same boat as that liberal. His health care scheme *must* work because he and all the leftists *want* it to work.


6 posted on 11/17/2013 6:28:49 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

It is ‘deserts’.

In this phase ‘deserts’ is the plural of desert, meaning “that which one deserves”.


9 posted on 11/17/2013 6:43:53 AM PST by agere_contra (I once saw a movie where only the police and military had guns. It was called 'Schindler's List'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
The proper phrase is “just desserts”, not “just deserts.”

Sorry, but that's incorrect.

10 posted on 11/17/2013 6:53:40 AM PST by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson