If someone is stupid enough to give DNA, then they shouldn’t count on being able to get that evidence suppressed.
You seem a lot more concerned about the alcohol testing on initial contact (which I would attack on scientific reliability, not consent) than you do about what happens after that. Have a drinking and driving problem?
That’s tiresome. If I had a dollar for every time somebody said stuff like that I could retire. When questioning the legality of red light cameras people like you will accuse me of running red lights.
If I oppose LEO beating down handcuffed subjects I get accused of having been arrested. Etc, etc, ad nauseum etc. You can do better than that I am sure.
You are an idiot with reading comprehension problems. All I have been saying from the beginning... Let me go slow and use small words and short sentences. I want you to really concentrate here if you can...
The admissibility of evidence obtained is moot. The officers, the off duty DFW officers are violating the concept of “being secure in your papers and person, whether or not they try to build a case against the public.
So I hope you concentrated. I hope we are done. Your lack of reading comprehension makes me sad. You can do better, take a course or something. They may even be free under Obama Care, I don’t know.