Posted on 11/19/2013 4:02:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Yup.
http://www.ausa.org/publications/armymagazine/archive/2013/11/Documents/Cone_Nov2013.pdf
"For example, the attached article shows a pretty woman, wearing make-up while on deployed duty. Such photos undermine the rest of the message (and may even make people ask if breaking a nail is considered hazardous duty), Arnhart said."
If she thinks that soldier is "pretty".....I disagree.
Moreover, all we have been told (again and again) is that looks and gender DOES NOT MATTER! Right?
And here is a female 0-6 having a hissy fit over both.
Any society that sends its women to fight before it sends its non-shaving boys and cane-borne old men deserves to be destroyed.
And eventually, if it maintains the folly, it will.
There is a picture of her, the Colonel, at this link, but I never can managed to post them on FR.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2511328/Miss-America-contestant-lashes-female-colonel-said-female-soldiers-pretty.html
Specifically, intentionally barren ex-harlots with a bad attitude and social disorders who in more enlightened times would have been shipped off to a convent or an isolated farm.
If I say what I want to say, I’ll get banned from the forum, so I’ll just clam up.
Morning Dog Pound Brother...
The people responsible for putting women - the life-MAKERS - in harm’s way need to be removed from EVER being in positions of authority.
Social engineering and leftist fantasy-land BS gets people killed, period.
Why do I get the feeling that COL Lynette Arnhart looks like Janet Reno’s much uglier sister?
I meant in terms of combat experience.
Wouldn’t one need to be a combat veteran in order to become an officer?
In our brave new world.... evidently not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.