Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army PR push: 'Average-looking women' (Part of their agenda)
The Politico ^ | November 19, 2013 | Kate Brannen

Posted on 11/19/2013 4:02:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

The Army should use photos of “average-looking women” when it needs to illustrate stories about female soldiers, a specialist recommends — images of women who are too pretty undermine the communications strategy about introducing them into combat roles.

That’s the gist of an internal Army e-mail an Army source shared with POLITICO.

“In general, ugly women are perceived as competent while pretty women are perceived as having used their looks to get ahead,” wrote Col. Lynette Arnhart, who is leading a team of analysts studying how best to integrate women into combat roles that have previously been closed off to them. She sent her message to give guidance to Army spokesmen and spokeswomen about how they should tell the press and public about the Army’s integration of women.

“There is a general tendency to select nice looking women when we select a photo to go with an article (where the article does not reference a specific person). It might behoove us to select more average looking women for our comms strategy. For example, the attached article shows a pretty woman, wearing make-up while on deployed duty. Such photos undermine the rest of the message (and may even make people ask if breaking a nail is considered hazardous duty),” Arnhart said....

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: agenda; army; military; obama; women; womenincombat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2013 4:02:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I can’t think of a single superpower military that ever did this.


2 posted on 11/19/2013 4:06:09 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In other words: dykes.


3 posted on 11/19/2013 4:06:52 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Yep


4 posted on 11/19/2013 4:07:32 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Soviet Russia in World War II because they had no choice. That’s it.


5 posted on 11/19/2013 4:08:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“In general, ugly women are perceived as competent while pretty women are perceived as having used their looks to get ahead,” wrote Col. Lynette Arnhart, who is leading a team of analysts studying how best to integrate women into combat roles that have previously been closed off to them.

Five'll getcha ten.

6 posted on 11/19/2013 4:09:00 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I looked for a photo. Nada.


7 posted on 11/19/2013 4:09:31 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Nope. Homely dykes.


8 posted on 11/19/2013 4:10:41 PM PST by Obadiah (I Like Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Found one, but it's from the back. That's her on the far left:


9 posted on 11/19/2013 4:12:35 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Turn the enemy to stone.



Not to mention new recruits.
10 posted on 11/19/2013 4:13:16 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (HELL, NO! BE UNGOVERNABLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“...Col. Lynette Arnhart,...”

Yeah... I’d follow THAT O-6 into battle any day...

Not.


11 posted on 11/19/2013 4:13:31 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The comment about ‘breaking a nail’ reminded me of docking the USS Jouett (CG-29) in Pearl Harbor, HI. One of the female line handlers assigned suddenly dropped our line in the water and checked her nails; a contractor onboard yelled ‘Are your nails OK?’. She filed a complaint, but because it wasn’t a Sailor, it didn’t go anywhere. Good thing there were male line handlers to run over and take over where she failed.


12 posted on 11/19/2013 4:14:21 PM PST by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
We SHOULD be discussing the perfect race.

(no one sees that comin' ?)

13 posted on 11/19/2013 4:14:49 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It ain't the way you look, good or bad, that matters in combat, sweetheart.

This "Colonel" needs to go back to analyzing something she's good at analyzing......like her belly button.

14 posted on 11/19/2013 4:14:59 PM PST by Repeat Offender (What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Looks like “she” is hovering around 50% body fat.


15 posted on 11/19/2013 4:18:18 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Because we don’t want anybody to feel badly about themselves.” If you’re so precious and fragile that you get your feelings hurt because someone else is better looking than you you’re going to have a hell of a time dealing with someone who wants to shoot you or cut your head off.


16 posted on 11/19/2013 4:19:28 PM PST by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

#24 “Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of American life.”


17 posted on 11/19/2013 4:23:32 PM PST by dfwgator (Fire Muschamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Col. if you want to tell all those service women they
can’t wear make-up, better you than me.


18 posted on 11/19/2013 4:26:17 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

The politicized military brass is turning the armed forces of the United States into homogenized homosexualized smooth inoffensive non-hydrogenated automotons that look alike, think alike, and take orders alike. Both sexes pushed towards sort of a weird medium breasted butch thing maybe even with a pecker.


19 posted on 11/19/2013 4:28:26 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

People are PAID to come up with this stuff. PAID with tax dollars.


20 posted on 11/19/2013 4:29:46 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson