Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massachusetts Senate overwhelmingly approves minimum wage increase to $11 an hour
The Republican ^

Posted on 11/22/2013 6:26:09 PM PST by matt04

The Massachusetts Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to raise the state's minimum wage from $8 an hour to $11 an hour over three years, giving a boost to nearly 600,000 workers and putting the state on track for the highest such pay in the nation.

The Senate voted 32-7 to approve the increase.

Under the bill, amended during debate, the minimum wage would increase to $9 an hour on July 1, $10 an hour on July 1, 2015, and $11 an hour starting July 1, 2016. The minimum wage in Massachusetts last increased to $8 an hour in January 2008.

In the shadow of a looming 2014 ballot question on the minimum wage, the Senate also voted 31-7 to increase the wage for tipped employees to half the minimum wage. The tipped wage is currently $2.63 per hour.

One supporter, Sen. Mark C. Montigny, a New Bedford Democrat, said the bill might help close the growing gap between the rich and poor.

"Tens of thousands of people are working full time and living below the poverty level," Montigny said. "It is inexcusable."

The bill now moves to the state House of Representatives, which is unlikely to vote on a minimum wage bill until sometime next year.

The bill for the first time would index the state's minimum wage to inflation. Starting in 2016, the minimum wage would rise each year at the same rate as the consumer price index for the Northeast.

Supporters have said the increase is needed because some companies are making strong profits, but lower wage workers are falling behind.

Opponents, including some business leaders, said that an increase would hike costs for businesses and could prompt layoffs.

(Excerpt) Read more at masslive.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: boston; minimumwage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Opponents, including some business leaders, said that an increase would hike costs for businesses and could prompt layoffs.

No s*^%. In a few years they will be wondering why everything costs more and people are laid off or see hours slashed.

1 posted on 11/22/2013 6:26:09 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt04

Look for massive layoffs for minimum wage employees ... stupid, stupid, stupid.


2 posted on 11/22/2013 6:29:18 PM PST by doc1019 (Inside every older person is a younger person wondering what happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Probably not so many layoffs. Most likely just never getting jobs to begin with.


3 posted on 11/22/2013 6:32:01 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

If $11.00 is good, why isn’t $110.00 ten times better. No liberal will answer that.


4 posted on 11/22/2013 6:33:01 PM PST by cdcdawg (Be seeing you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
The bill for the first time would index the state's minimum wage to inflation. Starting in 2016, the minimum wage would rise each year at the same rate as the consumer price index for the Northeast.

Gee, think there will be a sort of symmetry between the Massachusetts unemployment rate and the inflation rate? Come hyperinflation, things will get very entertaining.

This cesspool of a state also recently indexed its gas tax for inflation. I hope to escape someday.
5 posted on 11/22/2013 6:33:19 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

“The Massachusetts Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to raise the state’s minimum wage from $8 an hour to $11 an hour over three years,”

The Massachusetts Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to bar entry level and many other low-skilled workers from employment.


6 posted on 11/22/2013 6:35:22 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

I am thinking of Wyoming


7 posted on 11/22/2013 6:36:03 PM PST by shineon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Exactly. So there more likely to vote democratic(as if they did not do so already).


8 posted on 11/22/2013 6:36:36 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

close the growing gap between the rich and poor, why not 150.00 an hr? so there will be no gap...


9 posted on 11/22/2013 6:36:40 PM PST by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Look for massive layoffs for minimum wage employees ... stupid, stupid, stupid.

And look for massive wage increases for union labor -- whose contracts are often tied to some multiple of the minimum wage.

Stupid, stupid, stupid. But only if you're trying to improve the state's economy, instead of rewarding a political crony.

10 posted on 11/22/2013 6:37:17 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
This cesspool of a state also recently indexed its gas tax for inflation.

At least it's cheaper than CT gas prices.

11 posted on 11/22/2013 6:37:59 PM PST by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: matt04

Don’t worry. Once they legalize the new 30Million Democrat voters, they will import more Mexicans to work under the table at these jobs. The newly minted Democrats will be on welfare along with the rest of us.


12 posted on 11/22/2013 6:39:05 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

FOOLS!!!


13 posted on 11/22/2013 6:39:39 PM PST by szweig (HYHEY!! (Have You Had Enough Yet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04
One supporter, Sen. Mark C. Montigny, a New Bedford Democrat, said the bill might help close the growing gap between the rich and poor.

"Tens of thousands of people are working full time and living below the poverty level," Montigny said. "It is inexcusable."

No, fool. It means more won't be working full time and will be jobless...with an even wider gap between rich and poor.

14 posted on 11/22/2013 6:40:08 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

As Rush says every few years: “why 11 dollars an hour?”. “Why not 25 or 30 dollars an hour?”


15 posted on 11/22/2013 6:40:56 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

More and more of those jobs will be automated away.


16 posted on 11/22/2013 6:43:57 PM PST by Kozak ("Send them back your fierce defiance! Stamp upon the cursed alliance! To arms, to arms in Dixie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

The minimum wage law dates back to 1938.
218 representatives, 51 senators, and 1 president could repeal it.


17 posted on 11/22/2013 6:44:47 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

“As Rush says every few years: “why 11 dollars an hour?”. “Why not 25 or 30 dollars an hour?””

Has anyone noticed if you go out for breakfast it’s $25+ for two people?
That’s on the cheap side. This inflation that can’t be mentioned is getting really expensive....../S


18 posted on 11/22/2013 6:46:54 PM PST by 9422WMR (: " Tolerance is the virtue of a man who has no convictions".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: matt04

The libs continue to shoot themselves in the foot.


19 posted on 11/22/2013 6:49:46 PM PST by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

liberal cheapskates.


20 posted on 11/22/2013 6:56:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson