Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww
A politically informed population would throw these political jerks out on their butts, but we have a lot of dummies and the press making sure no education gets through in a way that expresses the truth of what is going on here.

Is Obama setting Israel up for a war we probably would have to intervene in?
I don't think Obama would want to intervene, but if something happened I think the voters would demand we do help Israel (minus the Democrat Jews of the USA of course for the most part...God help them).

261 posted on 11/23/2013 10:47:20 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy; All

News is getting out there...:

Both Iran and Israel acknowledged that Obama’s negotiated agreement was, in fact, a huge win for the Iranian regime.

According to the BBC, Iranian diplomat Mohammad Zarif triumphantly announced that the deal does include language that guarantees Iran the right to enrich fissile material.

(But).... President Obama did not explicitly admit that fact, and reports state that the agreement may actually paper over that vital point.

Practically speaking, however, the deal allows Iran to move forward with its program with stealth, while preventing Israel from doing anything about Iran’s facilities.

Meanwhile, the Israel government responded to news of the deal with alarm. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the deal an “unbelievable Christmas present,” stating that it presented Iran with the ability to continue pursuing nuclear capability “for practically no concessions at all.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/11/23/Israel-Iran-christmas-present


263 posted on 11/23/2013 10:50:08 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy

Obama hasn’t listened to Americans for a very long time...he won’t be listening if Israel gets hit either...just words no action.


265 posted on 11/23/2013 10:52:47 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

To: A CA Guy

More here...

.....even the New York Times acknowledges that “only some elements are frozen, and rollbacks in the initial agreement are relatively minor” and can be easily reversed.

Furthermore, the “deal” would mean the United States would retreat from its previous clear red line—one embodied in repeated U.N. Security Council resolutions—of requiring that Iran stop enrichment.

It would allow Iran to move ever closer to nuclear weapons while getting significant sanctions relief.


266 posted on 11/23/2013 10:55:30 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson