Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamIII

No.

This a thread about Iran. Why you want to redirect to a discussion about Russia is curious.

Evidently you don’t understand or care why Iran is on the list of states that sponsor terrorism.

All your redirection does not alter the fact Obama is cutting his deal with a country his own State Department designates as a country that supports terrorism.


57 posted on 11/26/2013 5:27:52 AM PST by Gabrial (The nightmare will continue as long as the nightmare is in the Whitehouse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Gabrial

Why you want to redirect to a discussion about Russia is curious.

It’s no more curious than the many posters who cite to Munich 1938. They’re drawing a historical analogy - and so am I . I’m saying that negotiation even with bad guys who sponsor terrorism doesn’t automatically make you an appeaser. If it did, Reagan was an appeaser for negotiating with Soviets - and striking a deal that left them with far more nuclear capability than Iran has.

Bottom line: I prefer some realistic negotiated deal with Iran over a war with Iran. In my mind, that’s following Reagan’s example, and it’s certainly following common sense. A lot of the same folks who want war with Iran also promoted the Iraq war - and I consider that war to be a historic disaster.


59 posted on 11/26/2013 4:40:11 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson