Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ravnagora

I think this is a mistake; having a law defining marriage gives the fringe a specific target for their shenanigans. Marriage is marriage, and you don’t need a law to know that it requires a man and a woman.


4 posted on 12/01/2013 11:18:18 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

The U.S. needs to pass a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between a man and a woman, and associate actions which violate that amendment as giving aid and comfort to the enemy.


5 posted on 12/01/2013 11:23:02 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson