Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juan Williams: Dems now party of women (RATS own them)
The Hill ^ | 12/02/13 | Juan Williams

Posted on 12/02/2013 4:43:32 PM PST by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Graewoulf
Is there a separate category for Debbie Wassermen Schultz, or Ninny Pelosi?

Oh hell yeah.

Entomology.

61 posted on 12/02/2013 9:54:01 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Indeed. Single women are more likely to be dependent on the government.


62 posted on 12/02/2013 9:56:34 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I have women friends. Often, they are STUPID about politics!


63 posted on 12/02/2013 9:56:42 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Funny how the party of the gay misogynists own women... you know, only good for death.

These are not women per say because men too are now wood to this side. And without the media and the GOP conceding everything to the Democrats, it would not be so.

Truth of the matter is promoting woman’s inadequacy by saying it is good to get abortions as if adequacy was a bad thing is how it is spun. They do not forgive adequacy the way the right and the religious have forgiven inadequacy.

To live in fear of having responsability over children is the foundation of terror... and this is why it acceptable to them to see suicide islamic terrorists children. Because animals fear men and women, the evil wants to turn them thus. It is the same way they turned black people around with the GOP conceding again guilt.

Show me a communit collectivist and I will show you that the rest of the world regardless of race or mental abilities as a far better off place than these fear-beasts.


64 posted on 12/02/2013 9:56:47 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Never mind Obamacare and its destruction of health depending women... the GOP is conceding democrats are leaders in womens health solutions to the media drumbeat.


65 posted on 12/02/2013 10:07:36 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Some more wandering Williams wordy worthless writhings.


66 posted on 12/03/2013 5:33:28 AM PST by mosesdapoet (Serious contribution pause.Please continue onto meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Seriously! In all this discussion of health care and the failure of Obamacare, have you or anyone heard from Republicans?

Why don't they create a national campaign telling Americans what their vision of health care is and what they would do rather than sitting on their collective duffs and complaining about Obamacare.

Yes, Obamacare sucks, but where is the positive message about how it could be and would be under Republicans? Why are they wasting this opportunity to be cheerfully positive and giving real hope to Americans who desperately need it?

67 posted on 12/03/2013 5:39:47 AM PST by Obadiah (I Like Ted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

“I have women friends. Often, they are STUPID about politics!”

I haven’t seen any of those political knowledge polls in a while. There’s definitely a Republican/Democrat difference, but the male/female thing is astounding. A common result for a question that about 55% of Republican men get right, you see about 45% of Dem men get right, with the female Democrats being aware in the low to mid teens.


68 posted on 12/03/2013 5:42:30 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Bob Becklel I can watch. Juan gets muted or better yet I change channels.


69 posted on 12/03/2013 5:43:06 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
You and me would be loads happier if women lost the right to vote. If we went back to the year 1918. Womens suffrage was Federale legislated......

19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Women\'s Right to Vote www.archives.gov › America's Historical Documents‎ Passed by Congress June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, the 19th amendment guarantees all American women the right to vote. Achieving this ...

70 posted on 12/03/2013 9:15:07 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

No, I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t want to live in Saudi Arabia either.

So do you feel the same about blacks voting?


71 posted on 12/03/2013 9:18:40 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
>> People should have a stake in the system.

People who don't support the system should not be permitted to vote.

72 posted on 12/03/2013 9:22:58 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Why bother repeating yourself? I would have no problem seeing the vote limited to those who work and those who own property. The way it was when America was founded


73 posted on 12/03/2013 9:38:28 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

But you repeat yourself, suggesting we’d be better off without women voting—yet somehow you sense that it wouldn’t be right to say the same about blacks voting.


74 posted on 12/03/2013 10:02:52 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I wonder how many people would willingly trade their right to vote for government handouts?

That would be an interesting solution. Since one receiving government aid could be seen as receiving a bribe, it makes a certain kind of sense that anyone receiving money from the government (outside of Social Security) should have their voting privileges suspended until such time as they are no longer receiving said aid. The justification being that anyone receiving aid would only vote to continue receiving or expanding that aid.

Hmmmmmmm.


75 posted on 12/03/2013 10:14:32 AM PST by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What’s happened is that all the young, single, pro-abortion-rights women of the Eighties and Nineties have spent the last ten years finding husbands to browbeat in a desperate attempt to breed and so are no longer single. They’ll be lucky to have one kid, and thus their numbers will be halved within a generation.


76 posted on 12/03/2013 10:27:14 AM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Yep, all they do is whine about the Tparty and conduct “inquiries”.


77 posted on 12/03/2013 10:54:05 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

All those women with kids going to bolt when the insurance bill comes due.


78 posted on 12/03/2013 10:55:04 AM PST by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter

Not if they are fully subsidized, which is the plan.


79 posted on 12/03/2013 10:56:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Oh, but they won’t. In fact, I bet most of them end up on the short end of the stick in this deal.


80 posted on 12/03/2013 11:02:25 AM PST by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson