[fishtank]

ICR article image

[BitWielder1]

Um, didn't Sauropods exist 60 million years before the Earth is supposed to have been created?

[TXnMA]

"(ICR article)"

Thanks for the warning -- but no thanks on ICR.

I'll stick to real Biblical creation and real science...

[fishtank]

Another very startling finding that demonstrates the sudden/catastrophic burial of very large creatures is a 1971 finding in Southern Mongolia of a perfectly articulated Protoceratops and a Velociraptor frozen in a life and death struggle with each other. Obviously these two creatures were buried suddenly by a huge catastrophe of magnificent proportions. The dinosaurs didn't even have time to fall over. 51

http://www.detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html

[Rebel_Ace]

Quoting the logic from your excerpt:

"...A half-century later, Charles Darwin suggested that giraffes born with longer necks than their rivals could reach more food and were thus better fit to survive. If either one of these ideas were true, scientists should find ancient “giraffe” fossils reflecting a pattern of transformational neck growth over time..."

Applying EXACTLY the same logic to the idea that Humans and Dinosaurs existed contemporaneously:

If Humans and Dinosaurs lived at the same time, then YEC researchers should be able to find Human Fossils in the same strata as Dinosaur fossils, as regularly as Dinosaur Fossils are found with Fossils of other species.

But the fact is that they don't. You apply the logic when it suits you, and when presented with "transitional" fossils, you claim they are of "different kinds" and then require more transitional fossils.

There is no conspiracy of concealment when it comes to fossils, the Earth is right out there for you to start digging in to produce examples to support Humans and Dinos living at the same time. Grab a shovel...

[Don Corleone]

Darwin is only good for sponsoring the annual “Darwin Awards” IMHO!

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

Every time someone points out common features as evidence for evolution, the response is that of course the Designer would reuse components. But here, we have dinosaurs getting thicker cartilage as they get larger while mammals’ cartilage gets thinner. The thicker dinosaur cartilage lets their limbs support their weight better; why didn’t the Designer reuse that component in mammals? Instead, we’re left with thin cartilage that erodes and tears and leads to arthritis. What’s the rationale?