Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy plans nuke-powered carrier (India)
The Telegraph, India ^ | December 4 , 2013 | SUJAN DUTTA

Posted on 12/05/2013 11:45:46 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

New Delhi, Dec. 3: The Indian Navy is designing a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that it wants in its fleet, costs permitting.

An indigenous nuclear-powered submarine, the Arihant, is now in trials in the Bay of Bengal.

The Indian Navy “desires” to have three operational carriers in its fleet but the only one in use currently, the INS Viraat, is rusting away faster than it would like.

“The INS Viraat is ‘long in the tooth’ (outdated and too expensive to maintain),” the chief of naval staff, Admiral D.K. Joshi, said here today.

Naval headquarters is gradually beginning to take the view that the ship will have to be decommissioned before the planned end of its extended tenure in service.

The 55-year-old carrier has had several refits that have cost the defence budget heavily.

The navy commissioned the INS Vikramaditya (formerly the Gorshkov) in Russia last month. The carrier, now on its way to India, will take about six months after berthing in Karwar on the west coast to be made fully operational. It is expected in Indian waters in January.

Only the US Navy operates two or more aircraft carriers — always nuclear-powered — in Asia. The importance of aircraft carriers in the Indian Ocean region is right now a matter of focus for strategists after China commissioned its own, the Liaoning, earlier this year.

China also announced last week that it was imposing an air defence identification zone in the East China Sea, over waters disputed by Japan and South Korea. Aircraft carriers are the naval platform-of-choice for “sea control”.

The Indian Navy will take a final call on its proposed 65,000-tonne nuclear-powered carrier after studying the experiences of the UK and France.

Naval headquarters has set itself a deadline of two months in which to freeze the design. Nuclear propulsion would give the vessel a longer life but the reactor is expensive to build.

But India has fitted an 80MW reactor, with Russian help, into the Arihant submarine. Nuclear propulsion also provides longer endurance and therefore capability to deploy the vessel farther for extended periods.

The UK abandoned the idea of nuclear propulsion for its Queen Elizabeth II carrier, now being built for its Royal Navy, because of the costs involved. France is the only country barring the US that has built a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier on its own, the Charles de Gaulle.

The other decision, apart from the propulsion, that the naval design department is yet to freeze is whether the second indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC-2) should have Catobar (catapult assisted take-off barrier arrested recovery) like the US carriers or a flight deck for short take-off and arrested recovery (Stobar).

The 65,000-tonne IAC-2, tentatively named the Vishal, follows the Vikrant, or IAC-1, a conventional diesel-gas powered 44,700-tonne vessel being built in Kochi.

The Viraat, the only operational carrier with the navy currently, is planned to be in service till 2017 when the Vikrant is scheduled for commissioning. The Vikrant was floated out of the dry dock in Kochi in August this year.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aircraftcarrier; india; navair; navy

1 posted on 12/05/2013 11:45:46 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Project Habakkuk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Habakkuk


2 posted on 12/06/2013 12:00:05 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

!


3 posted on 12/06/2013 12:01:42 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

News to you?


4 posted on 12/06/2013 12:04:28 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet ("Of the 4 wars in my lifetime none came about because the US was too strong." Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

For our Navy Freepers a question. With anti ship missiles and widespread use of drones, are aircraft carriers becoming vulnerable and obsolete? Are they going the way of the Battleships?


5 posted on 12/06/2013 5:28:24 AM PST by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"news to you"
nah, just wondering..
what took them so long?

*used as a status symbol..like the
Angolan (Spanish) aircraft carrier*

6 posted on 12/06/2013 7:34:12 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ops33
not naval, I stayed @ a Holiday Inn last night *joke*

Are they going the way
of the Battleships?

yeah, unless the USA can reduce their (carrier) silhouette..
perhaps submerging (RCS)/lowering the silhouette of the USN
aircraft carrier like WWII Japanese subs (401/402/403)

7 posted on 12/06/2013 7:51:01 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Most likely aircraft carriers are obsolete in terms of modern naval warfare between a 1st class powers or between a 1st & 2nd class power. But they’re still valuable to overawe lesser countries. Properly handled they may still have some utility in modern combat.

How’s that for a “definite/maybe”?


8 posted on 12/06/2013 9:33:57 AM PST by Tallguy (between taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Its the definitive definite/maybe.

I can see a Naval battle of the future where opposing warships are attacked by hordes of UAV’s.


9 posted on 12/06/2013 2:59:27 PM PST by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson