Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
You know, usually trying to explain ANYTHING to a low-information voter or mush-brained liberal is an exercise in futility. But, folks, this is actually an EXTREMELY easy point to get across to even the most stubborn fools.

The minimum wage is arbitrary. It's labor effort that is what matters.

The “Hours of labor” required to purchase anything will eventually stabilize at the exact same level it was prior to an arbitrary increase.

To help a min-wage proponent visualize this, just think of a $75 product, such as a kid's bike, or a watch, or a coffee maker. I chose $75 since it's about 10 times the current minimum wage. You can really think of ANY price range, just be able to determine how many labor hours that is in current minimum wage dollars.

Then simply tell them that this $75 thing will cost $150 soon after the minimum wage increase, and they'll be in the exact same place they were before the minimum wage was increased. They're going to work 10 hours for that bike.

If there's any glimmer in their eye once you explain this, hammer it home with the additional story of how the guy building the bike wants more money too, once they got their “raise”.

14 posted on 12/08/2013 5:42:26 PM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreenAccord

Exactly. Currency is just an arbitrary reference for exchange of value so we don’t have to barter. A gallon of gas is worth about 25 minutes of menial labor. Pay someone $60/hr to run the gas station cash register, and soon that gas will cost $25/gal.


21 posted on 12/08/2013 6:01:43 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: GreenAccord

Let’s also try this argument, cribbed from I forget where.

A willing employer and a willing employee agree to trade labor for dollars. Both are happy. It is a free market, after all; if either side did not like the deal, there would be no deal.

Except some busybody steps in and raises a stink about the unfairness of the deal. What gave him a right to interfere?


25 posted on 12/08/2013 6:39:39 PM PST by AdSimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson