Alright, well here is where the rubber is meeting the road. I’m glad you brought this up because I think this is one of the main sources of resistance here.
What does it mean to “guarantee access”? Just consider that phrase for a bit.
Now (I’m assuming you took at least a few minutes to carefully consider it) let me ask: does the phrase “guarantee access” necessarily equal “guarantee possession”?
Already considered before you mentioned it.
In fact, I consider it every time I hear a leftwing Dem politician use the very same phrase.
The Govt should not be in the business of "guaranteeing access" to things like capital or healthcare. One should work to gain access to these, not be given it by the Gov't. We already had a scenario in which Gov't pushed guaranteed access with the '08 crash and the subprimes. Socialist policies don't work.