Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackElk

Most of which you’re implying I said, I did not actually say.


128 posted on 12/15/2013 6:06:25 AM PST by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better (I AM ANDREW BREITBART)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
If you find Romney, Ryan, McConnell and Boehner better than their actually Marxist and social revolutionary Demonrat overlords, then offer specifics rather than mere denial.

Did you happen to catch Ryan's sappy performance on Meet the Depressed this morning with his legislative love object Patty Murray? The two of them were slobbering all over each other in their newfound spirit of cooperation in the rape of the American taxpayer and the two-year deal to continue the destruction of this nation. They REALLY got to know and trust one another behind closed doors! Can't you just see the tears of joy flowing down Boehner's artificially tanned and naturally drunken cheeks? Perhaps he will have the opportunity to serve as best man at the political wedding of Murray and Ryan? And then, he can fight it out with Nancy Pelosi for who catches the bridal bouquet. Maybe Boehner/Pelosi political nuptials are in the offing.

Meanwhile, over at This Weak on ABC, we were treated to a lengthy cheer-leading session on "the Republican civil war," on how mean Rush Limbaugh is to Pope Francis, and everything interspersed with breathless interviews of Secretary of State John F'n (did you know he served in VietNam but served whom?) Kerry about how we will want to keep troops in Afghanistan for as long as necessary to guarantee that Afghani school girls will continue to be educated in Afghan schools among other social goals and about what a hero John F'n was in VietNam and how he shared a real "camaraderie" with Swift Boat vets (presumably the same ones who sunk his POTUS candidacy).

I skipped Deface the Nation. Did I miss anything?

Detail your degree of tolerance for Romney, Ryan, McConnell, Boehner and their ilk and your rationale.

You may be a fine person and a good conservative but don't you think it is about time that conservatives became collectively and individually pissed off at the trash who claim to lead our party and that we have an obligation to drive them from public life? If the "GOP" "wins" under such "leadership," what is "won" isn't worth a bucket of stale, ummm, ale. Just what is the point of merely slowing by a year or two the destruction of the nation?

Today's GOP is nothing but pale pastels and a subsidiary of Wall Street and the Demonrat Party. We NEED an opposition party and we don't have one.

Where is H. L. Mencken when we really need him?

129 posted on 12/15/2013 9:01:52 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em, Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
You essentially said that "our" spineless servants of Marxists are better than "their" full blown Marxists. Your terminology may differ and you may even imagine that a Republican House under Boehner, a Republican Senate under McConnell and a White House occupied by some servant of the Wall Street and K Street crowd might govern acceptably. Actually, in the unlikely event that the public would elect them and that Demonrat vote fraud will not overcome the GOP-E as usual, the result would be the final destruction of the Republican brand and with it all hope in the near or even foreseeable future of rescuing the Republic.

What do you think I am implying that you said?

137 posted on 12/15/2013 10:44:02 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em, Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson