Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. crude oil production rising faster than expected, to test record highs by 2016
globeandmail ^ | Dec. 16 2013, 4:07 PM EST | SABINA ZAWADZKI

Posted on 12/16/2013 3:47:31 PM PST by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ckilmer

Good info and input; thanks for sharing.


21 posted on 12/16/2013 5:09:22 PM PST by onona (The Earth is the insane asylum for the universe (yup, I belong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks ckilmer.


22 posted on 12/16/2013 6:39:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Expansive oil development. Brought to you by, high oil prices.

It is amazing how efficiently the free market works when you just leave it alone. Commie Libs hoped to see $10 per gallon gas to force us out of our cars. Little did they know or understand that $4 per gallon gas was just the impetus to make shale development viable.

Commie Libs are so stupid. They will never understand the underlying realities of life, like thing gun prohibitions reduce gun violence. So stupid, Libs.


23 posted on 12/16/2013 9:39:11 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Free goodies for all -- Freedom for none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onona
Refinery capacity in the toilet.

The US already refines more crude oil than we use ourselves.

24 posted on 12/17/2013 4:47:13 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
We need more refineries and a similar ban on the export of finished product.

How do you think that would work? We already refine more product than we use ourselves. You want a private company to spend billions of dollars to build another refinery while you want to restrict them from selling the product?

25 posted on 12/17/2013 4:48:57 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

OK then, we don’t need more refineries, except for backup when one goes out of service.


26 posted on 12/17/2013 3:13:44 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
in places like the baaken, the price of oil at the well head is only about 74 dollars a barrel— so its still cost effective to ship the oil by rail to the east & west coast refineries.

They have refinery capacity in Wyoming, why don't they expand that and build pipelines from there to ND and MT?

27 posted on 12/17/2013 3:26:44 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thackney
You want a private company to spend billions of dollars to build another refinery while you want to restrict them from selling the product?

Actually I don't care about restricting them so much as requiring them to charge the foreigners twice as much as Americans for transportation fuels.

Same with pharmaceuticals.

28 posted on 12/17/2013 3:33:43 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson