Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Algae to crude oil: Million-year natural process takes minutes in the lab
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ^ | 12/17/2013 | Tom Rickey

Posted on 12/20/2013 9:24:42 AM PST by logi_cal869

Engineers have created a continuous chemical process that produces useful crude oil minutes after they pour in harvested algae — a verdant green paste with the consistency of pea soup.(snip)

In the PNNL process, a slurry of wet algae is pumped into the front end of a chemical reactor. Once the system is up and running, out comes crude oil in less than an hour, along with water and a byproduct stream of material containing phosphorus that can be recycled to grow more algae.

With additional conventional refining, the crude algae oil is converted into aviation fuel, gasoline or diesel fuel. And the waste water is processed further, yielding burnable gas and substances like potassium and nitrogen, which, along with the cleansed water, can also be recycled to grow more algae.(snip)

The recent work is part of DOE's National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels & Bioproducts, or NAABB. This project was funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds by DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Both PNNL and Genifuel have been partners in the NAABB program.

(Excerpt) Read more at pnnl.gov ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algae; biofuel; energy; green; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
The thought of 'greenies' becoming unhinged at this development amuses me greatly.

Plus, a couple of ironies: Government research investment truly seems to have paid off, developing a potential process to free us from the Mideast and, secondly, this does nothing to reduce our so-called 'carbon footprint' (its product is hydrocarbons, regardless its source).

Another irony: They seem to have set out in 2009 to develop an 'algae-to-natural gas' process and discovered 'algae-to-oil' as an unexpected byproduct.

If they can get the cost down, refineries can go full cycle on-site, water being the only real raw material (if I understand it correctly). "Byproducts" & "waste" yet to be determined. Hopefully this stuff has the energy of petroleum-based gasoline.

I'll leave the rest of the speculation to others here.

Peak oil? Yeah, right; so much for that. Peak lithium? Absolutely.

1 posted on 12/20/2013 9:24:42 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Rust Belt cities on the Great Lakes have access to a lot of fresh water.


2 posted on 12/20/2013 9:30:08 AM PST by gasport (Will operate for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Turning “pea soup” into oil sounds like a good use for pea soup. I wonder if they will have to exclude ham from the recipe?


3 posted on 12/20/2013 9:30:10 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

algae — it’s green energy.

It’s better than burning corn and driving up the cost of livestock feed and tacos.

Now to produce enough algae to make it economically doable — that’s the question.

If not will kudzu work???


4 posted on 12/20/2013 9:31:08 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

To make this feasible on any significant scale,,,,how big are the algae ponds going to have to be? What’s the growth/turnover rate of the algae?


5 posted on 12/20/2013 9:33:27 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

“In the PNNL process, a slurry of wet algae is pumped into the front end of a chemical reactor. Once the system is up and running, out comes crude oil in less than an hour, along with water and a byproduct stream of material containing phosphorus that can be recycled to grow more algae.”

So in this process more potential energy from oil is produced than energy consumed?


6 posted on 12/20/2013 9:33:58 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Now to produce enough algae to make it economically doable — that’s the question.

Grow it on sewage.

7 posted on 12/20/2013 9:34:21 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

I wonder what the EROEI on algae is.


8 posted on 12/20/2013 9:36:00 AM PST by Theoria (Obama lied. My health care died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

What investment of man hours, raw material and energy has to be put into each barrel of oil from this method?

I could get my 13 year old to power the house with a stationary bike generator, but then I would have to feed him. Not worth it.


9 posted on 12/20/2013 9:36:43 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Well, is this cost-effective (or could it be made to be) with shale oil?

If not, then it stands little chance of replacing that source. No matter how “green” the biological source of petroleum may be, there is a cost-benefit ratio that has to be respected.


10 posted on 12/20/2013 9:38:23 AM PST by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ
So in this process more potential energy from oil is produced than energy consumed?

Even if it's break even or not-quite break even, it still might be worth doing.

It converts intermittent sunlight into a continuous oil stream.

If it disposes of an otherwise burdensome waste stream.

11 posted on 12/20/2013 9:39:37 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ

“So in this process more potential energy from oil is produced than energy consumed?”

I think if you add in the sunlight and CO2 the algae needs it will be a slight net loss, given entropy (TdeltaS).

I doubt they sieve algae from water directly, though you could.


12 posted on 12/20/2013 9:40:00 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

This is an interesting way of turning solar energy into a usable fuel.


13 posted on 12/20/2013 9:41:03 AM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Tens of millions of acres of algae pools to produce significant amounts of oil, not likely to be competitive with drilled wells.


14 posted on 12/20/2013 9:41:19 AM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

You don’t feed him now?

May as well salvage something from the food budget...


15 posted on 12/20/2013 9:41:28 AM PST by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Thanks FO the post.

By th way, this wouldn have to be excepted.


16 posted on 12/20/2013 9:42:20 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished..... If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL ”KnOcK” LIST jut FReepmail me..... This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....
17 posted on 12/20/2013 9:42:29 AM PST by Red Badger (Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
his does nothing to reduce our so-called 'carbon footprint'

Not true.

While I am not suggesting truth in the global warming / carbon output scam, the algae to oil plans result if far less carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.

The end product is essentially the same, but to grow the algae, it removes CO2 to grow. So what is released is carbon that was already in the air, not captured underground.

18 posted on 12/20/2013 9:44:01 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

This isn’t activism.


19 posted on 12/20/2013 9:45:03 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ
So in this process more potential energy from oil is produced than energy consumed?

Algae to oil processes are essentially a solar energy process. Sunlight provides the energy the algae needs to grow and build its hydrocarbon chains. The processing is just "squeezing out" the chemical energy captured from the solar energy input.

20 posted on 12/20/2013 9:47:19 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson