You just can not... 
make this stuff up, eh?
http://worldofwonder.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/t22263l560g.jpg
Obviously this is supposed to be a detriment to the Christianity of Phil Robertson.
The fact is that Hollywood and the entertainment industry is so filled with queers, that it is impossible to be involved in the industry in any way without dealing with them somewhere down the line.
You just can not... make this stuff up, eh?
http://worldofwonder.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/t22263l560g.jpg
“The Fluffer”
Sounds like that marshmallow in a jar you buy for hot chocolate.
he might well not be gay...
and he needed the money
He might be a cowboy . . . . . . looking for a cowgirl ..
Is that the best that the queers can come up with?
Laughable.
I’m shocked!
Not. At. All.
Gearge C Scott starred in a movie about Snuff Films....but I doubt he’s killed anybody ;-)
One of the things about the media establishment is how little they understand America, and us.
“Duck Dynasty” was supposed to be a campy sendup of ignorant Bible-thumping hicks.
It’s not surprising, then, that given the strong association with camp as a sensibility and homosexuality as a lifestyle, that the creative energy behind the IDEA of the show came from a gay man.
Gee, a gay actor in Hollywood. Who would ever have believed it.
Next your going to be telling me there was gambling at Rick’s Place in Casablanca.
Is this supposed to shock people or change their opinions?
And just how is this revelation supposed to taint the people who are opposed to such behavior? It doesn’t. But, being associated with the seedy underside of gay life in gory detail isn’t exactly helpful to A&E, they’re trying to mainstream it, not expose the most disgusting aspects. Leftist fail. Again.
Also, the guy who wrote the article for GQ, is finding that gay outrage articles may be good for business.
Here’s another of his;
http://deadspin.com/is-the-nfl-blacklisting-kerry-rhodes-1300128496/1302966581
You see a trend here with the media and the demon left? They know conservatives have one fatal flaw that can be repeatedly exposed. This flaw is simply that, like anyone, they are not perfect. Since conservatives hold themselves to ideals, standards of right and wrong, they will always look like hypocrites to the media.
“...homophobic comments...”
He who controls the meaning of words gets to control the outcome of the discussion. Since Jesus tells us directly in Revelation 22:15 that people who practice sexual immorality cannot qualify for eternal life in His kingdom, then by this usage Jesus was a homophobe, and anyone who accepts what He says is also a homophobe.
We are thus being coerced to choose between the beliefs and values that are acceptable to the popular culture and those acceptable to the Savior. There was a time in the history of this country when the popular culture was not at war with the values of Jesus.
What upsets the folks at GLAAAAD more, that God has been telling humanity for thousands of years that homosexual behavior is a sin, or that Phil Robertson was so uninhibited
about to fully quote from one of the passages that declared it to be sin? I think they seek to invert the sin: that making reference to God’s opinion about the sin is itself the “sin” of “homophobia”.
In the Gospel of Matthew, in chapter 15 verse 6, there was an incident where people had “voided the commandment of God by your tradition”, that is another way of saying what is socially correct behavior. But this has been the effort of liberals (er, “progressives”) for many years. We are beyond the stage in the 1960’s where liberals (er, “progressives”) were demanding free speech. Liberals have now gotten sufficiently in power in government, media and entertainment that they can control what speech is allow and what is forbidden. We find that the “free speech” they demanded was only free as long as it conformed to liberal ideology. Now it is conservatives who must demand free speech.
The twist is that liberals always wanted to go beyond speech that was free. They wanted speech that changed society. Notice how much liberal energy is going into destroying social norms especially for sexuality. There is now severe sanction against “other-ism” as well. Liberals are yearning for any society, social structure and social norms except those based on the Judeo-Christian ethic and values. That is to say, based on values that people find in the Bible.
What values do the folks at GLAAAD uphold and put forth as something I should adopt, teach my children and work to advance? Their values are sexual chaos. In their value system, sex is about anything and everything except conceiving children and raising them to be responsible and productive human beings. Their values would lead to the death of humanity.
Indeed, it has already started:
Deaths will outnumber births in Spain by 2017, experts say
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/deaths-will-outnumber-births-in-spain-by-2017-experts-say
If today’s liberals are anything, they are above all the most selfish people in many generations, for they are paying for their busy work by massive borrowing from the children who they are busy making sure will never be born. That is not “sustainable”.
No, but if you go to the men's room at the bus stop, you're sure to get hooked right up.
It is obvious that the target audience for Duck Dynasty when it was created was those who would ridicule their backwoods lifestyles. When they discovered that the real audience was those who shared the values of this family of honest hard working Christians, they decided to sabotage the whole show.
The GQ interview was a set up.
I remember this movie being discussed on FR . I didn’t know what fluffier meant so someone FREEP mailed me to explain it . Folks here at FR are so helpful .
This just reaffirms Hollywood’s evil ways, not the cast of Duck Dynasty.
And Hollywood’s sick twisted side is not news.
Oh Rummy......Merry Xmas! And U know what?
Fluffer Dynasty will never work!
I remain a Holy Duck!
All this literally quacks me up!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6eeor3PPtw
I’m sure way back in the duck blinds of their minds they are thinking: “we made these guys what they are today — and since we made them we can break them.”