Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

“Boehner is not increasingly needing to run to Democrats for votes. He has broken the Hastert Rule 8 times, most of them having to do with budget issues. The majority of the House Reps voted for the Ryan-Murray budget deal—only 94 Reps voted against it. You are overstating the “conservative core” numbers. And the GOP leadership in both houses is not conservative despite their claims to the contrary.”

Right, 94, and more against other deals. Roughly half of the GOP in the House right now, and about the same in the Senate are willing to vote against them. Contrast that to even a few years ago. I’d say that’s a pretty good core to start with. It shouldn’t be all that hard to increase those numbers enough to oust the leadership from both houses.

“VA is the canary in the coal mine when it comes to what is happening in this country. We are seeing electoral shifts in states like NV, Colorado, NM, and AZ, which are becoming purple and then blue. CA is the prime example of how a state can turn from reliable Rep to solid Dem. How many states are turning red versus those changing to blue? Demography is destiny. The electorate is changing and our immigration policies are a major reason why. “

Virginia is NOT the canary in the coal mine. No other state has 1/3 of it’s area within the Beltway orbit. Yes, we’ve lost some states to blue but others are turning red. The GOP has gained in far more states than it has lost.

“Easier said than done. And winning primaries doesn’t equate necessarily to winning elections as we found out in Del, NV, Ind., and Missouri. I have no problem with challenging the RINOs in the primaries, but it is a mixed bag as we found out in the VA governor’s race. The RINOs control the party in most states and have most of the money. The power of incumbency cannot be underestimated. “

Yes, and in most of those the candidate was winning and shot themselves in the foot. It was not a logistical or campaign problem. If indeed the RINOs controlled most of these states, those candidates wouldn’t even have gotten on the ballot. We are seeing them rise up everywhere and winning primaries, even sometimes if they are seriously flawed. Your examples contradict your own statement.

“We are fighting a rearguard action. Obama will rule by executive order if he has to and he won’t be challenged by the Congress. Waiting him out is not a winning strategy. He can and will do tremendous damage over the next three years. And Obamacare will develop deep, deep roots that will be impossible to remove. Much of the money to implement the program has already been appropriated. The Ryan-Murray deal ensures that it will be fully funded for the next two years.”

Not as much as you think or that gets hyped here on FR. An actively resistant Congress and Courts can easily shut that down if people are willing to get up and fight for it. Obama has already been knocked won more times than I can count and more are coming. He throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks. Frankly, for as much as he’s put out, the executive hasn’t gotten all that much done.

“Romney received a million more votes than McCain. He won the non-Hispanic white vote (total 59%-39%) across all age groups, gender, and marital status. In former times, he would have won easily. But the demographics of the electorate have changed rapidly. What five states are you talking about? The 165K number seems incorrect if you include states like Ohio and FL. “

Your blatant ignorance isn’t my problem. Romney lost because too many white people stayed home or skipped the ballot. We failed to turn out our base because Romney was too flawed and contradictory. This explains it pretty well:

http://townhall.com/columnists/jackkerwick/2013/08/08/why-romney-lost-n1659078/page/full

The 165Kswing comes from this article, and it was 4 states not 5:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/11/333-000-Votes-in-4-Swing-States-Would-Have-Given-Romney-the-Presidency

That’s an exceedingly small amount, and we’re not even talking about if anyone made the effort to get states to apportion them by congressional district. The states you list have all been solid blue for a long time, yet we’ve basically evened up with the Dems on the Presidency for the lats 30 years.

Bottom line is we didn’t win primarily because whites didn’t turn out to vote, despite all the immigration stats you have there. In fact, we’ve been gaining politically as I said despite these numbers. I believe part of that is that these surveys aren’t accurate and surveyors aren’t always told the truth. Plus, many of those states include illegal immigrants who can’t and shouldn’t vote but skew the numbers.

I also don’t necessarily trust the work of these institutions and professors who often have a left leaning bias. For all the boogeyman scenarios I haven’t seen it at the ballot box. What I have seen is an inept GOP that runs milquetoast candidates and disorganized campaigns.

But you miss my point, because as is typical of someone your age, you always focus on the broad sweep of numbers and politics and electoral maps. Our constitutional govt allows us opportunities to lead beyond the Presidency. We can, if organized, use our advantage to tip things back to our favor, like voter ID, busting the unions, reapportioning the electoral map, and so it. I believe a veto proof majority is not out of our grasp, among many other things.

“No, I am 71. I have both the experience and knowledge to understand what is happening to this country. How old are you?

I am dealing in facts, not some Pollyanna view that we can still win despite massive immigration that is changing the electorate. We are no longer the same country. We have in 2013 45 million foreign-born in this country and most of them favor the Democrats. Every state is feeling the impact and it will grow. “

And at 71 you are still bound by the thinking of your age group that is still living in the USA of 50 years ago. This is not then. It’s great that you’ve drawn breath for that long, but that doesn’t translate into you actually knowing something. You have things all laid out and wrapped in a pretty bow, but your chain of logic is weak and doesn’t fit with what’s actually going on. You are quite ignorant to many other factors beyond simple demographics.

I’m 45 and I have 20 years experience in politics, including 15 years of running campaigns at all levels, and also in country and district leadership in the party. There are many who know more than me, but I guarantee you I know more than YOU. You have NOT analyzed what’s going on more than me, as I guarantee you I’ve put in a far more intense and grueling level of study on a far broader range of election issues than you have. You are overly focused on one thing and not very knowledgeable beyond that.

What I’m talking about is using what advantages we have, particularly at the state level, to start dismantling the Democrat party. It can be done because we’ve started doing it in places like WI, MI, and IN, among others. That and becoming more efficient and researched and using our momentum better as a party. Considering the disparity of effort between us and the Dems, the Dems should own it all by now. Obviously they have flaws we can exploit. We just need to stop holding on to outdated thinking and start moving forward.


153 posted on 12/27/2013 8:24:09 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: Free Vulcan
Virginia is NOT the canary in the coal mine. No other state has 1/3 of it’s area within the Beltway orbit. Yes, we’ve lost some states to blue but others are turning red. The GOP has gained in far more states than it has lost.

In terms of Presidential elections, name some blue states that are turning purple and then red aside from WV. VA has always been within the Beltway orbit, but it voted Rep for President for 40 years prior to 2008. What is Iowa's excuse for being so dependable Dem?

We are seeing them rise up everywhere and winning primaries, even sometimes if they are seriously flawed. Your examples contradict your own statement.

Everywhere? And you can expect the GOPe to strike back as the Chamber of Commerce and Karl Rove are doing right now. Money is the mother's milk of politics and the GOPe has most of it. We will see in the upcoming primaries if McConnell and Cornyn, among others, will lose to a more conservative candidate. Rove has already predicted that none of these challengers will take down a Rep incumbent in the primaries.

Frankly, for as much as he’s put out, the executive hasn’t gotten all that much done.

I don't know what metric you are using, but from my vantage point, Obama has gotten a lot done.

He has taken over one-sixth of the economy with Obamacare, which will not be repealed. He has used the EPA and other agencies to attack and shut down the coal industry. He has given a backdoor amnesty to 500,000 Dreamers, including issuing them work permits. The GOP will be proposing its own version of the Dream Act, which could give amnesty to 1.4 million and this is not counting the parents of the Dreamers who can be sponsored by those getting amnesty 21 and older. Obama has added over $7 trillion to the national debt and it will over $20 trillion when he leaves office. Obama has done many other things involving foreign policy, national security, the military, etc. that I could list. He has been wildly successful in achieving his agenda.

Your blatant ignorance isn’t my problem. Romney lost because too many white people stayed home or skipped the ballot. We failed to turn out our base because Romney was too flawed and contradictory. This explains it pretty well:

The first link you provided gives no facts, just assertions that aren't borne out by the facts. Obama beat McCain by 10 million votes and Romney by 5 million. Obama received 69 million votes in 2008 and 65 million votes in 2012, the two highest vote totals in American history. If Obama's voters had turned out like they did in 2008, it would have been no contest. McCain only won 55% on the non-Hispanic white vote.

The 165Kswing comes from this article, and it was 4 states not 5:

The article is wrong. It did not include the final vote totals. Go to this link to get the final official results

Romney lost Florida’s 29 electoral college votes by a margin of 73,858. Obama won with 4,236,032 to Romney's 4,162,174.

Obama won FL 4,237,756 to 4,163,447, a difference of 74,309.

Romney lost Ohio’s 18 electoral college votes by a margin of 103,481. Obama won with 2,697,260 to Romney’s 2,593,779

Obama beat Romney 2,827,709 to 2,661,437, a difference of 166,272.

Romney lost Virginia’s 13 electoral college votes by a margin of 115,910. Obama won with 1,905,528 to Romney’s 1,789,618.

Obama beat Romney 1,971,820 to 1,822,522, a difference of 149,298.

Romney lost New Hampshire’s 4 electoral college votes by a margin of 40,659. Obama won with 368,529 to Romney’s 327,870

Obama beat Romney 369,561 to 329,918, a difference of 39,643.

Adding the vote totals up for the four states, this amounts to a difference of 429,522 votes not the 333,000 in the article. Nor does the article include states that Romney barely won like NC in this swing scenario. This is the way losers look at elections similar to what Gore and Kerry said about their narrow losses to Bush. Gore actually received more popular votes than Bush.

The article you linked also made the following false statement:

Overall, voter turnout was down, from 131 million in 2008 to 122 million in 2012. Obama won 7.6 million fewer votes than he did in 2008, and Romney won 1.3 million fewer than McCain in 2008.

Voter turnout in 2012 was 129,231,960. Obama won 4 million less votes than 2008 and Romney won 1 million more votes than McCain. Next time get your facts straight.

And at 71 you are still bound by the thinking of your age group that is still living in the USA of 50 years ago. This is not then. It’s great that you’ve drawn breath for that long, but that doesn’t translate into you actually knowing something. You have things all laid out and wrapped in a pretty bow, but your chain of logic is weak and doesn’t fit with what’s actually going on. You are quite ignorant to many other factors beyond simple demographics.

LOL. You are missing the point. I am saying that this is no longer the America of 50 years ago. We have an entirely different demographic and electorate. In 1970 89% of the population was non-Hispanic white compared to 66% today. In 1970 one in 21 was foreign born, today it is one in 8. It has electoral consequences.

I’m 45 and I have 20 years experience in politics, including 15 years of running campaigns at all levels, and also in country and district leadership in the party. There are many who know more than me, but I guarantee you I know more than YOU. You have NOT analyzed what’s going on more than me, as I guarantee you I’ve put in a far more intense and grueling level of study on a far broader range of election issues than you have. You are overly focused on one thing and not very knowledgeable beyond that.

I have been active in politics far longer than you have. I also have two advanced degrees in political science. My grandfather was a ward healer for Frank Hague. I understand how politics work at every level. I lobby on the Hill. But I do understand one thing that you seemingly do not. Numbers matter. And when the other side outnumbers you and is continually adding to its numbers while ours are decreasing, you have a political problem. The growing percentage of minorities and immigrants (strong Dem constituencies) as part of the electorate has an impact on electoral politics. It always has if you know our history. We are now heading into uncharted territory. Samuel Huntington wrote about it.

Voter ID is not going to change the equation as much as we would like it to. It just delays the inevitable. I have been working with a group here in VA on that issue and we have been successful in making some important changes legislatively. However, as a poll watcher, I can see the changing electorate and they are voting legally.

You live in Iowa, which is far from being representative of what is happening in the rest of the country. Talk to Steve King sometime about immigration and its impact on electoral politics. I had him on a panel I organized at CPAC.

What I’m talking about is using what advantages we have, particularly at the state level, to start dismantling the Democrat party. It can be done because we’ve started doing it in places like WI, MI, and IN, among others. That and becoming more efficient and researched and using our momentum better as a party. Considering the disparity of effort between us and the Dems, the Dems should own it all by now. Obviously they have flaws we can exploit. We just need to stop holding on to outdated thinking and start moving forward.

Yes, there are some small triumphs at the state and local levels and we should try to build on them. But in terms of the larger picture, we are losing both electorally and on the issues. There is a generational gap and a demographic gap. By 2019, half of the children 18 and under will be minorities as defined by the USG. And by 2046, half of the country will be minorities. The Dems understand this, which is why they will focus their efforts on solidifying that support and painting the Reps as racists, bigots, and xenophobes. And they are joined in those efforts by the likes of McCain, Graham, Rove, the Bushes, etc.

The one holding to outdated thinking is you and the rest of the GOPe. You think that we just have to do a better job of communicating our message of limited government and lower taxes and elections will be won. As Jeff Sessions has said many times, the way for the party to win is to move away from the corporate elite and move towards being the party protecting the American worker and jobs. Both parties have abandoned the American worker. Here is an article I wrote for the American Thinker a few months ago.

155 posted on 12/27/2013 10:02:14 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson