He was picking up teens on Manchester's Oxford Road.
That was infamously an area frequented by runaway teenagers who would sleep with adults in exchange for money, liquor, clothes or even hot meals or ration cards.
The particular person he was caught with that day claimed to be 19.
He was 41.
So we have a military scientist with a top security clearance picking up youngsters on the streets.
Any chance that might have been a bad idea? Potentially a bit of a security risk in cold war Britain? Not to mention disgustingly exploitive of vunerable children?
of course
People in important and sensitive positions need to be held to higher standards, not the lower or invisible ones we have now
If he was a security risk, it was only because he was doing something that shouldn’t have been illegal in the first place. Regardless of what one thinks of the ‘gay agenda’ an act between consenting adults is between them and God, not the state.
I must say that I am very disappointed in Queen Elizabeth right now. Of all times in our history here in America, this almost seems like the worst to incite additional homosexual propaganda on American Christians.
We have been victim to horrid court decisions on gay marriage, a Rose Parade featuring a gay wedding, a growing embracement of gay marriage in the media, and vicious attacks on Phil Robertson.
But the Queen, instead of sympathizing with American pro family Christians, decides to slap us in our face by making a hero out of a criminal.
Doing nothing by adding to the Gay Propaganda.