Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

H-6K can strike regional targets without leaving Chinese airspace
Want China Times ^ | 2013-12-26

Posted on 12/26/2013 8:34:58 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The People's Liberation Army's H-6K strategic bomber can attack the Japanese mainland with CJ-10 cruise missiles without even leaving Chinese airspace, reports the Kanwa Defense Review run by Andrei Chang also known as Pinkov, a military analyst based in Canada.

China had no real nuclear projection capability until H-6K entered service with the PLA Air Force, Kanwa's report said. H-6K bombers have already been deployed with the 8th and 10th air divisions of the PLA Air Force. However, strategic bombers alone can not help China penetrate enemy defenses using surface-to-air missiles. For this reason, the long-range cruise missile has become a crucial part of China's nuclear arsenal.

With a range of between 1,500 and 2,000 kilometers, the CJ-10 meets the requirements of the PLA Air Force to possess the capability to launch strategic missile attacks against US military facilities and those of its allies in the Western Pacific. All major cities in India are also within range if the H-6K launches the missile from Tibet.

In a potential war against Southeast Asian neighbors over territories in the South China Sea, the CJ-10 could be launched directly against Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines from the airspace of China's southern island province of Hainan. Although the bomber and cruise missile lack the range to attack Russia's largest cities, they pose a major threat to Russian cities in the Far East. An H-6K taking off from the air base of the PLA's 10th air division in Anqing, Anhui province, would be able to strike at all US military bases in South Korea.

If the bomber were commanded to attack Japan's main island of Honshu, the best choice from which to launch the CJ-10 missile would be the airspace of the Shandong peninsula at a distance of 1,700 kilometers, the article said, while Heilongjiang province in northeastern China is only 1,100 kilometers from the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; bomber; china; h6k
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/26/2013 8:34:59 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Confucius say man who throw stone from new house get housewarming.


2 posted on 12/26/2013 8:40:17 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why is the Chinese variant slower and much shorter ranged than the Old Russian Badger that it essentially is? Engines? Anyone know?


3 posted on 12/26/2013 8:44:53 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

My guess is the engines. The PRC has long had problems in that area.


4 posted on 12/26/2013 8:55:38 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Probably because the engines are made in China. China uses russian engines in their stealth fighter because the chinese copies of the same russian engines will not perform as well as the russian made ones.


5 posted on 12/26/2013 9:07:12 PM PST by BBell (The Blue Dog is Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Makes sense. I was about to make fun of a 1959 design,, then I remembered the B-52. Don’t like communist air forces. But that’s a clean looking airframe. Aesthetically pleasing.
Something about those jet designs from the 50s that really looks good. So many from that era just “look right”. (To paraphrase Kelly Johnson)


6 posted on 12/26/2013 9:14:31 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That looks like 60’s-70’s technology on the outside


7 posted on 12/26/2013 9:22:38 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

in service in no other country save PRC.


8 posted on 12/26/2013 9:24:14 PM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Brits had one in 1949

9 posted on 12/26/2013 9:24:21 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I know what you mean. So many designs from the era, as you said, “look right.” Very clean lines and proportions that, on a visceral level, “feel” right.


10 posted on 12/26/2013 9:28:00 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Something about those jet designs from the 50s that really looks good. So many from that era just “look right”. (To paraphrase Kelly Johnson) (?)

11 posted on 12/26/2013 9:32:08 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fella

Yes, They could launch an attack on Japan but what would the Japanese do in responce? I know what Obama would do—Go to the UN and write China a letter—strongly worded. I believe the Japanese naval units would slap a blockcade on China and sink any ships coming in and going out—and blast their rocket stations. The Japanese would go nuclear in a week!


12 posted on 12/26/2013 9:40:35 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Pei-Ping!


13 posted on 12/26/2013 9:53:38 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It’s a Russian Tu-16


14 posted on 12/26/2013 10:11:41 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
The Japanese would go nuclear in a week!

Do the Japanese have nucs now?

15 posted on 12/26/2013 10:33:40 PM PST by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Veteran, 70-71a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; Army Air Corps; BBell

The newer H-6K uses the same Russian made engines used on the IL-76, so it has a combat radius of 3,000-3,500 km.


16 posted on 12/26/2013 10:41:34 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Yeah, spread all over the pacific and headed our way on the left coast.


17 posted on 12/26/2013 10:42:22 PM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks for the information.


18 posted on 12/26/2013 11:06:46 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of SVR4
Yeah, spread all over the pacific and headed our way on the left coast.

LOL, yes, but I was thinking more of the stuff that makes mushroom clouds.

19 posted on 12/26/2013 11:55:06 PM PST by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Veteran, 70-71a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
you can (certainly) bet, they have the technology..
(in much smaller size/much more accurate)
and they're still excellent production managers.

20 posted on 12/27/2013 12:29:45 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson