Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Little Sisters of the Poor, who staff homes for the elderly poor, say they will LEAVE THE USA rather than participate in funding contraception, sterilization, and abortion.

"If you have religious 'free exercise' you can keep your 'free exercise' --- elsewhere."

If the poor sisters do not comply, they face hefty fines. Although it varies between locations, some face amounts of $100 per employee, per day. Fines could have started today, Jan. 1, 2014, without this temporary injunction.

The Little Sisters are being defended pro-bono by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, whose clients have included religions from A-Z: Anglicans to Zoroastrians. The Becket Fund has defended dozens of faiths including: Amish, Buddhists, Evangelical Christians, Hindus, Jews, Lutherans, Mormons, Native Americans, Non-Denominational Christians, Presbyterians, Roman Catholics, Santeros, Sikhs, Unitarian Universalists, and Zoroastrians.

Please support with your prayers and your resources:

http://www.becketfund.org/

THANK YOU!

1 posted on 01/01/2014 11:23:57 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

Working link...

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/01/four_injunctions_against_the_obamacare_contraceptive_mandate_yesterday.html


2 posted on 01/01/2014 11:32:53 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Supreme Court of the United States

No. 13A691

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER,
COLORADO, A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Applicants,
v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES, ET AL.

O R D E R

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the
applicants,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents are temporarily enjoined from
enforcing against applicants the contraceptive coverage requirements
imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U. S. C.
§ 300gg-13(a)(4), and related regulations pending the receipt of a response
and further order of the undersigned or of the Court. The response to the
application is due Friday, January 3, 2014, by 10 a.m.

/s/ Sonia Sotomayor
Associate Justice of the Supreme
Court of the United States

Dated this 31st
day of December 2013.


3 posted on 01/01/2014 11:37:59 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Do the “Little Sisters of the Poor” still field a football team?


4 posted on 01/01/2014 11:42:52 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

In law, intervention is a procedure to allow a nonparty, called intervenor to join ongoing litigation, either as a matter of right or at the discretion of the court, without the permission of the original litigants. The basic rationale for intervention is that a judgment in a particular case may affect the rights of nonparties, who ideally should have the right to be heard.

Justice Sotomayor grants temporary Obamacare exemption to nuns.

Sotomayor gave the government until Friday to file a response in the case. Her order extends only to the group of nuns and does not apply more broadly to the Affordable Care Act and its requirements.

Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, is at risk for an objection by an intervenor objecting to the appointments of an ineligible President. Appointments by an ineligible President are a violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. A sustained objection will require a hearing on Presidential eligibility or the Justice must recuse.


5 posted on 01/01/2014 11:44:07 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Oh no....don’t let the SCOTUS rule on this with John “Sell-Out” Roberts casting the swing vote again. He’s afraid of the Obama thugs who must have something devastating on this coward.

Did the Founders provide an impeachment mechanism for wayward Supreme Court justices? If not, they should have.


8 posted on 01/01/2014 12:05:42 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Did these people finally find their souls?


15 posted on 01/01/2014 12:20:30 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson