I’m in no position to defend Hillary against the information gathered by the mother of Sean Smith, a dead former Seal who was “on assignment” as a Foreign Officer (black op). She says “her sources”. That means that Sean Smith’s buddies have back-channeled her.
Now, she is saying that “Hillary killed” her son. Since it’s obvious to everyone that Hillary didn’t use the weapon, then we are left to interpret that Hillary’s actions/inactions rise to the level of murder in the eyes of a mom who has back-channel sources.
I trust the mom to be competent and knowledgeable. And I don’t know you or your sources.
All I know is what’s in the public eye, that what information is in the public eye doesn’t constitute murder, and that bereaved mothers do not necessarily use the same logic that is in circulation in courtrooms. If she has back-channel information that refutes that assumption, fine. Let’s see it and then we’ll judge.