You can draw a conclusion if you believe this mother who says her son was murdered and that Hillary is involved.
You have these two people and you have your gut. You know the character of Hillary, and you have the character of this son, raised by this mother, who gave his life refusing to desert his fellow Americans in their time of dire need. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, so you have some kind of insight into the character of the mother.
Who will you pick to believe?
I can disbelieve the mother not because I believe she is lying, but because she is a bereaved mother who wants somebody to blame, which is understandable, and would need more information than what I have to evaluate the facts.
That does not mean that I believe Hillary’s version, that it was all over a video and she really did try to save those poor men, but just then she fell and hit her head, and it doesn’t make any difference at this point if she’s guilty. She’s lying and she’s covering up, and she’s fallen and hit her head too many times if she says arrogant things like that out loud on TV.
But that does not establish what the truth is. At minimum, she is guilty of letting an ambassador and three servicemen get butchered without lifting a finger to cover up her transfer of shoulder-fired Surface to Air missiles to terrorists in Syria, and that might be what she’s lying to cover up. But it does not follow from that that she was complicit in their murder, other than by a failure to act. It would have been in her interest for Stevens to succeed in repurchasing the missiles she stupidly put in the wrong hands. Him being murdered would not help her cover up that act. So for those reasons, I’m skeptical, and would like to see more info.