I was thinking along some of the same lines. Now that we know Boehner’s plan, it doesn’t make any difference.
Only problem is if amnesty is a tar baby. Do they want us to go near it because most Americans have been cornswaggled into being for it?
I revert to my basic maxim: Do the right thing and let the chips fall where they may. Put this fact (of Boehner’s plan) in the hopper with everything else and run primary candidates who are against amnesty, among other things of course.
So, what if they get the cursed thing through before the elections? Does that harm all our tea party anti-amnesty candidates? Repeat step one: Do the right thing. Their campaigns alone could change the tide, a collateral benefit.
I seriously doubt that. I'd say at least half the public, and I believe more, oppose amnesty.
I revert to my basic maxim: Do the right thing and let the chips fall where they may. Put this fact (of Boehner’s plan) in the hopper with everything else and run primary candidates who are against amnesty, among other things of course.
Exactly. Do the right thing and you can't help but be at least as well off and maybe better off than if you hadn't. Gen. Blather makes the point that there might not be enough viable challengers to go around, and I hadn't considered that, but if not, count up the ones you have and "target" (channeling my inner Palin there) the worst RINO's and the ones holding critical positions (and the ones that would succeed deposed RINO's in those positions if they're RINO's as well). Get as far down that list as you can with whatever resources you have and you'll know that you did all you could. Boner obviously would make that list, no matter how few bullet candidates you had.