Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP's 'Young Guns' Program Backs Pro-Abortion, Pro-Gay Marriage Candidates for Congress
CNS News ^ | December 13, 1013 | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 01/05/2014 11:09:17 AM PST by JeepersFreepers

Although the Republican Party Platform opposes abortion and same-sex marriage, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) is backing and promoting through its "Young Guns" program two congressional candidates who are homosexual, and who support same-sex marriage and abortion.

Richard Tisei, who is “married” to his male partner Bernie Starr, in Edgartown, Mass., is running for a congressional seat in the 6th District in the Bay State. Carl DeMaio is running for a congressional seat out of San Diego, Calif. DeMaio, who is openly gay, supports abortion and same-sex marriage.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; 2014midterms; gaymarriage; gopprimary; homosexualagenda; proabortion; rinos; youngguns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: JeepersFreepers

Chicago Young Republicans

Pro-gay Marraige, Pro Amnesty, Pro Everything the Democrats are: Who needs them?!


21 posted on 01/05/2014 11:41:57 AM PST by chicagolady (Mexican Elite say: EXPORT Poverty and Let the the Stupid AmericanTaxpayer foot the bill !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hondact200

Mayoral candidate Carl DeMaio, right, holds hands aloft with partner Johnathan Hale as they march in the San Diego LGBT Pride Parade in July. — John Gastaldo

22 posted on 01/05/2014 11:44:11 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

Never EVER donate to the nrcc.


23 posted on 01/05/2014 11:46:27 AM PST by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

Hmmmm....Democrats or Establishment Republicans....Think, think, think...

To quote Hillary Clinton: “What difference does it make?”


24 posted on 01/05/2014 11:53:28 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands (Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

But, don’t dare mention the possibility of a truly conservative third party! That’s an invitation to instant attack.

Just keep working within the GOPe, hoping beyond hope that you can find the right words, the right argument, that will nullify the sway held by Tokyo Rove and his ilk.

Third party starting to look even better, IMO.


25 posted on 01/05/2014 11:59:16 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

Thers another one in New Hampshire that is runing and will probably take on Che Porter. But if that s what it takes to get a few of them to win in districts that might not otherwise go for it thats fine. Just make sure they don’t stab you in the back like Lindsay Graham on things that are really important. tiei is not really worth fragging because if he does win he will only serve 1-2 terms since it is a heavily dem district.


26 posted on 01/05/2014 12:05:54 PM PST by amnestynone (Lindsey Graham is feckless, duplicitous, treacherous, double dealing backstabbing Corksucker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers; All
From the article: "There is also a quote from NRCC Chairman Greg Walden, 'The Young Guns program recruits top tier candidates to challenge their liberal opponents and bring sound, conservative principles to their home districts and to Washington, D.C.' " (end quote)

On the face of it, who could argue with that? Haha!

It also occurs to me that if you wanted to be really optimistic, you could take the point of view that the Federal government has usurped FAR too many powers that are rightly the province of the states and the state electorate, and it interferes far too much in it's citizens' private lives. One of these candidates said that, or similar, and maybe they would be perfectly fine legislators (or better than the incumbents in their races, who would surely have the same progressive social views, likely more extreme, and ALSO very progressive views on national defense, interstate commerce, etc.)...

Of course, maybe that genie can't be put back in the bottle? But would that it could! Just imagine...no Massachusetts rules imposed on Ohio, no California rules imposed on Wyoming...no Fed's regulating your education, your gas mileage, your Christmas or other "Holiday" display...!! And yet, with all these GOP governors and state legislatures, we ALL have to live under the Federal mandates.

Reminds me of JFK saying he would not govern "as a Catholic" (deferring to Church teachings) and Romney likewise (re: Mormon teaching)...that turned out to be true in Kennedy's case, and I'm guessing would have been in Romney's, too, had he gotten the chance.

Perhaps, JUST perhaps, we could do worse???

27 posted on 01/05/2014 12:24:43 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

I don’t think we fully appreciate what kind of trouble we are in.


28 posted on 01/05/2014 12:26:25 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM; KC_Lion
But, don’t dare mention the possibility of a truly conservative third party! That’s an invitation to instant attack. Just keep working within the GOPe, hoping beyond hope that you can find the right words, the right argument, that will nullify the sway held by Tokyo Rove and his ilk. Third party starting to look even better, IMO.

Even if its candidate loses, conservatism will gain. Joe 6-Pack Democrats are mostly pro-gun and anti-government interference; their party has been over-run by what they themselves call "liberals." Joe 6-Pack Republicans are even less inclined to government and more to 2nd amendment, and find their party has been over-run by functional liberal Democrats. The Republicans' last presidential candidate was pro government-run health care, pro homosexual agenda, pro environmentalist/global warming agenda, abortion-friendly, and 2nd amendment hostile.

A third party now could possibly win, but it could also draw enough votes from either Rep-Dem candidate to make the leftist Rep-Dem winner lacking a popular mandate, as in more than half the country more conservative than he, voted "against" him. It truly hurt Clinton both times, even with the MSM on his side.

I think we should prepare ourselves: the GOP presidential nominee in Nov. of 2016 will be a Romney/Christie type, and Americans will be facing the same "Uniparty" dilemma it did in 2012. Count on it. So a third party thing might happen whether we like it or not.

29 posted on 01/05/2014 12:37:38 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

BANKRUPT THE NRCC!!


30 posted on 01/05/2014 12:49:43 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 88keys

I really couldn’t tell if you were saying these two candidates, or the Young Gun candidates in general, should be supported or not.


31 posted on 01/05/2014 1:28:29 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
It's not clear to me, either, but they're not in my district or state so that's not a decision I will have to make. If either were in my district, I'd certainly have to weigh the choices across the board.

It's the classic political dilemma. Which candidates have integrity? Which candidates would most reflect my views and principles? What choices do we have? Whose opinions and recommendations do we trust, if anyone's?

In my district, we had DENNIS! Kucinich for years upon years, and I dutifully voted for the GOP opposition, since there was never a viable, electable other choice. GOP never could field a great candidate, either. FINALLY, the GOP regained the Ohio governorship, as well as the State House and State Senate (chalk one up for the fly-over counties!)...the newest census came out, the districts were re-drawn, and as appalling as that whole process is, I would take John Kasich as Governor over Ted Strickland and Jim Renacci as U.S. Representative over Dennis Kucinich ANY time, whether I agreed with them on each and every policy issue or not (and if NOT, I would certainly let them know: at the state level/constituency, I think you have a fighting chance of being listened to)...

32 posted on 01/05/2014 2:40:05 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Finny
The Republicans' last presidential candidate was pro government-run health care, pro homosexual agenda, pro environmentalist/global warming agenda, abortion-friendly, and 2nd amendment hostile.

Romney?? Yes, state-government-run health care, in the state of Massachusetts ("quel surprise"!) but what is the basis for the rest of your statement? Romney was also not in favor of Federal government-run health care.

33 posted on 01/05/2014 2:48:48 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JeepersFreepers

If a conservative who is pro-life, pro gun, supports state rights, against illegals, wants a tax rate of 13%, but is gay, you wouldn’t vote for him? If he was running against an Obama supporter he got my vote.


34 posted on 01/05/2014 5:57:10 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (2014 the year of dead RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 88keys
In other words, you know very little about Romney's record, words, and actions.

You missed the bus. If you aren't aware of the mountain of information proving Romney's propensity for every single thing in that post, then I'm wasting my time, and you have wasted mine. You haven't done your homework for me to take the time to post links illustrating Romney's QUOTED WORD regarding homosexual "right" to adopt children, Gay Pride outreach to 6th graders, judges overriding her parents' decision to prohibit their 16-year-old daughter from getting an abortion, gays in the military, leftist environmental "save the planet" regulation, his ludicrous statements regarding guns -- this is 101 Romney. You don't know it. Posting the links here to wake you up is ludicrous -- it's been going on HERE for the past six years.

88keys, Republicans like you, who are willing to support Romney and accept him as one of "us," are going to FORCE a third party split because limited government conservative principle sails so far over your head that you think the dif between state and federal government control of health care, makes a dif. Either one is slavery to government, and freedom MUST REJECT Republicans and Democrats who advocate in any direction except THE OTHER WAY, toward freedom of self direction.

There's a difference between a guy (Romney) who very clearly, demonstrably sees government as a source of control and manipulation, versus a politician who calls out, "We must cut back government in every area of American life."

35 posted on 01/05/2014 6:06:44 PM PST by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 88keys
Romney?? Yes, state-government-run health care, in the state of Massachusetts ("quel surprise"!) but what is the basis for the rest of your statement? Romney was also not in favor of Federal government-run health care.

You are sadly incorrect.

He's a particularly odious politician, and a particularly inept one as well. You can't just listen to what he says when he's running for something, you also have to pay attention when he's not if you want to learn what he really believes.

In 2012, Romney publicly urged Obama to adopt the framework of Romneycare for the entire nation: Mitt Romney Urged Obama to Embrace the Individual Mandate (Redstate).
36 posted on 01/06/2014 6:57:00 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Well, thanks for taking the time to reply, anyway, FRiend.


37 posted on 01/06/2014 4:11:18 PM PST by 88keys ("work and purpose"...election 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Finny; RKBA Democrat; GeronL; who knows what evil?; Norm Lenhart

How Dare You Conservatives Walk off the GOP Plantation! If You don't vote for them You Could get Amnesty! Or a Huge Inflated Budget! You Know, all those things the Republicans have Stopped..../sarc

38 posted on 01/06/2014 8:53:17 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
BANKRUPT THE NRCC!!

How? I only donate, directly, to conservatives and groups like Senate Conservatives Fund. The US Chamber of Commerce and the Karl Rove RINOPACs will likely keep the NRCC afloat.

39 posted on 01/06/2014 9:02:20 PM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Finny

At this time in the cycle, GOPe sycophants claim that we need to ‘wait and see’ because surely the GOP will suddenly go Cruz/Palin any moment.

When the primaries arrive, they say “Well you shoulda done that third party thing months/years ago but right now we must unite behind the liberal or we will end up with a liberal cuz lesser evil and stuff....”

Same poop, different pooper.


40 posted on 01/06/2014 9:33:52 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson