Marriage, divorce, inheritance, alimony and child custody issues are so much more entangling than gun laws however. A temporary burden of changing your behavior while you visit another state is not all that chaotic. If you moved to a different state permanently, you’d have to follow their gun laws and change your behavior permanently. But unlike with a marriage, that affects just one person’s behavior and expectations, your own.
There is much more uncertainty involved for other parties when you are in a marriage or union and you move to another state which might not consider it valid. When you’re in a contract and something may or may not be able to declare it null and void, that’s guaranteed to send you into the courts for messy proceedings. Different state gun laws aren’t going to send people to court to hash out civil matters between each other.
I never thought it was necessary or pragmatic to regulate private behavior behind closed doors between consenting adults. But the idea of same-sex marriage is a fundamental reordering of the law. And it is greatly offensive to the constitution to see that done by judges. I believe the handful of states that voted for it were by people who don’t understand and probably haven’t been told the consequences of it. I think it’s a case of that 20% radical segment of the population directing the traffic of where the low-fos go.
As far as the homosexual agenda, it’s very clear it has no end game in sight. It is a radical, unnatural belief system that will never stop trying to get more power and make more and more radical changes to society if the rest of us sit back and let them. We all can already see or predict where the next stops are after same-sex marriage...legalized pedophilia, “transgender” mutilation of children, public sexual displays, homosexuality being taught as the norm.
We just saw the radical feminists last week writing in very carefully thought-out, literate language the utterly unnatural and insane idea that all heterosexual sex is rape. The radicals of yesterday that pushed for same-sex marriage 30 years ago have made themselves the mainstream cultural drivers of today. It will either continue in this direction or it will be turned back by proud and unafraid believers in the American system and Judeo-Christian principles.
You make many good points. Thank you for the kind discussion. I have been here a long time, but simply don’t post much because so many attempts at civil discourse devolve into name calling and ridiculous theatrics.
That’s totally bizarre, that’s totally against the logic I heard where men and women could coexist, and yet they call diversity rape. Now that’s just upside down thinking, if you ask me.