Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocking Prediction: Part II - The 'Second Phase' Of The Oil Boom Could Eclipse The First
investinganswers ^ | January 07, 2014 | By Jody Chudley

Posted on 01/07/2014 8:21:43 PM PST by ckilmer

Shocking Prediction: Part II - The 'Second Phase' Of The Oil Boom Could Eclipse The First

By Jody Chudley
January 07, 2014

 

Shocking Prediction: Part II - The 'Second Phase' Of The Oil Boom Could Eclipse The First

Last week, I told you about how the "second phase" of the oil boom could make the first phase look like small potatoes (you can read the article here).

At the end of my article, I mentioned that if the price of oil drops below $70 per barrel, horizontal drilling plays could see their margins shrink considerably, along with investment returns.

I know a lot of oil investors are worried about that potential outcome, so I wanted to write this follow-up to show you why I think high oil prices are here to stay, and why over time they're likely to go higher.

 
 

If you think we've escaped "peak oil" and oil prices are destined to fall... think again.

Back in 2008, before the financial crisis got into full swing, oil prices spiked to nearly $150 per barrel.  That was the year that the concept of "peak oil" really started to hit the mainstream media.

The textbook definition of peak oil is the point in time when the global production of oil reaches its maximum rate, then gradually declines.  In 2008, with American oil production in seemingly permanent decline and oil prices surging on decreasing supply, it appeared that peak oil was upon us.

But then something happened.  American oil production stopped declining and started to increase, because of new advances in drilling techniques. And that increase has been quite incredible:

The chart above from the U.S. Energy Information Administration depicts the sharp reversal American oil production has made.

The discovery of oil in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, led to a high point of 9 million barrels a day of oil production for the United States in 1985.  From there, production declined every single year through 2008 where it bottomed at 5 million barrels per day.

But then, by this past October production hit an incredible 7.7 million barrels per day -- a more than 50% increase from 2008.

Now with oil production rising, media headlines that in 2008 were warning us of peak oil have been replaced with headlines proclaiming peak oil's demise. Some are even suggesting the dawning of an era of American oil independence.

So if we're producing so much more oil, the question is why hasn't the price of oil gone down... and the share price of your oil stock with it?

The simple explanation is that "peak oil" isn't gone, and likely never will be.  It's just something that I predict is going to occur in stages.

Let me explain...

Through the year 2000 we had grown accustomed to oil prices that ranged from $10 to $30. Then, with seemingly little warning, oil rose through $30 and didn't stop until it hit $150.

This rise in prices wasn't the result of running out of oil.  It was a result of running out of oil that was inexpensive to produce.  This is all about supply and demand.

Prior to the year 2000 we could produce enough oil that could turn a profit at $20 to meet global demand.  What sent oil prices skyrocketing was that demand reached the point where it exceeded our capacity to provide a supply of oil at the prices we were accustomed to.

Those high oil prices weren’t all bad, though.  In fact, they helped us to develop unconventional methods like horizontal drilling and "fracking" that made it possible to extract more oil that had previously been harder to get at. And that led to the North American oil boom we are currently experiencing.

So why aren't oil prices dropping?  Because today's increased oil supply is being produced from shale or "tight oil" rocks.

Production of this oil requires drilling long and expensive horizontal wells. It also requires that the wells be "fracked" and chemicals and water be injected.  And production of this oil also creates wells that exhibit rapid rates of decline.

Add all of those elements together and producers are looking at costs of production that are multiples of what they were when producing conventional barrels of oil.

With all of the costs involved and high decline rates companies lose money if they sell that oil for $30 per barrel.  However, the new sources of oil make oil companies pretty good money at $100 per barrel.  At $80 per barrel, some of the companies make decent money. At $60 per barrel, the economics likely don't work.

Take a look at the IEA chart below.  Virtually none of today's energy resources can be produced profitably for less than $60 per barrel...

The bottom line is: If we want oil, we are going to need high prices. That's what peak oil is all about --  progressively higher prices that are going to allow us to continue to find new sources of oil.

We aren't running out of oil. We are running out of the easiest oil to extract.

With advanced (and more expensive) drilling techniques, oil prices may stay in this $90 to $110 range for a decade as we continue to exploit these new sources of oil that have opened up.

But once those sources enter a production decline (and they will), then the price of oil will likely start to move up again, until another new source of oil is opened up by even higher prices... and we enter into a new stage of "peak oil."

So if you're worried about your oil stock's share price dropping with the price of oil, I don't think you have much to worry about.  In my estimation, we're not going to see oil prices drop drastically from where they are now.

The fact is we need high prices to spur innovation and oil discovery.



TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; fracking; frackinggas; frackingoil; oil

1 posted on 01/07/2014 8:21:43 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Correct. There is no peak oil. There is peak cheap oil. Here is why:


2 posted on 01/07/2014 8:29:23 PM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
We aren't running out of oil. We are running out of the easiest oil to extract.If we want oil, we are going to need high prices . . . That's what peak oil is all about -- progressively higher prices that are going to allow us to continue to find new sources of oil.

No, “peak oil” - by its very nomenclature - is, “We’re running out of oil, and there’s nothing we can do about it!! The sky is falling!"
Jimmy Carter was all about peak oil. His policies made sense only if oil - particularly, if natural gas - was suddenly going to be completely depleted some day. There was such a thing as “MOPPS” - “Market Oriented Production Price Survey” (IIRC) during the Carter years. It came back with an analysis projecting that increased prices for natural gas would bring forth increased production of natural gas. Completely unexceptionable to the author of this article - but anathema to Jimmy Carter, who demanded “MOPPS II,” as the Wall Street Journal described it. But it still came back with an elastic supply curve for NG, and Carter still rejected it.

Price controls seem to make sense to people who believe that the supply of a product is completely independent of how much people are willing to pay for it. And since governmentists want to control prices - and everything else - they promote “inelastic supply curve” theories such as “peak oil.”

Inelastic supply curves make about as much sense as “man-made global warming.” I’m sure Jimmy Carter still thinks NG price controls make sense. Just like we could enter a new Ice Age and Al Gore would still believe that combustion of carbon by people was warming the planet.

3 posted on 01/08/2014 4:01:06 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Except there are already new, radical cracking technologies coming on line that will radically lower cracking costs.


4 posted on 01/08/2014 4:28:46 AM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS

Not to mention stacked laterals in the Permian, which will allow several layers of shale to be drilled from a single site.


5 posted on 01/08/2014 6:30:38 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS

That would be great if it happens.


6 posted on 01/08/2014 7:59:31 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

The author is saying something different.
The author is saying that there is peak CHEAP oil.
And that oil price has to be high to make it worthwhile to extract it.


7 posted on 01/08/2014 8:00:55 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The author is saying something different.

The author is saying that there is peak CHEAP oil.

And that oil price has to be high to make it worthwhile to extract it.

. . . all of which is unexceptionable - and was during the Carter Administration. At any given time, the cheapest oil to find and produce has always already been found and produced.
My point is that the moniker “peak oil” is a “sky-is-falling” propaganda claim that all the oil is almost all gone, and we need to conserve the last 5 drops of oil for the future.
The implication of peak cheap oil is simply that efforts to hold down the price of oil are counterproductive. The implication of absolute peak oil would be the logic of rationing.

8 posted on 01/08/2014 8:12:18 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Yes, but the article is about peak cheap oil, not peak oil. (as in an absolute last drop scenario).

Why does no one want to talk about that?


9 posted on 01/08/2014 8:28:29 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Peak cheap oil is an entirely unexceptionable concept, requiring no discussion. All it means is that whatever cheap oil is produced will be very profitable, because the price is set at the margin - and the marginal barrel of oil is expensively produced by horizontal drilling and fracking.
10 posted on 01/08/2014 10:31:53 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
It is also worth remarking that the production of “tight” oil and gas from shale used to be impossible and now is merely expensive. What is the guarantee that experience will not show the way to substantially reduce the cost of fraccing? It is normal for that to occur.
11 posted on 01/08/2014 10:38:16 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Peak cheap oil is not unexceptional to comment on because hardly anyone is aware of it. I hear way too often people saying they expect that the cost of oil/gas products is going to come down.

The cost of these products is not going to come down because it would be unprofitable to extract them at formerly cheap extraction costs.

It would be good for people to be aware of this.


12 posted on 01/08/2014 3:58:15 PM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Your point is well taken. Again, tho, experience might reduce those costs to some degree - and also increase the ability of the drillers to predict which formations can be exploited most profitably.

It is also the case that the value of maintaining the Strategic Petroleum Reserve ought to be reviewed in light of changes in production capacity created by our fracking infrastructure. Can the requirements of the SPR be better/more economically met by making sure that we have a backlog of fracked wells held in reserve?

My understanding of the SPR, which may be out of date, was that it consisted of low-quality high sulphur crude which was hard to refine. Maybe now would be the time to use that up on a non-emergency basis, possibly replacing it with crude from fracking?

13 posted on 01/09/2014 5:55:33 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson