Surprise: Attorney "Investigating" IRS Targeting of Conservatives is an Obama, DNC Donor

Townhall.com ^ | January 9. 2014 | Katie Pavlich

[Fester Chugabrew]

The woman heading the "investigation" into the improper targeting of conservatives by the IRS, is an Obama and DNC donor according to a new report published in Breitbart News. . . .

[lavaroise]

Might as well get ready for another paychedelic road show of blame not blaming the coke head in chief.

[fatnotlazy]

I’m sure she will be fair and impartial.

(SNICKER)

[Servant of the Cross]

"By selecting a significant donor to President Obama to lead an investigation into inappropriate targeting of conservative groups, the Department has created a startling conflict of interest. It is unbelievable that the Department would choose such an individual to examine the federal government's systematic targeting and harassment of organizations opposed to the President's policies. At the very least, Ms. Bosserman's involvement is highly inappropriate and has compromised the Administration's investigation of the IRS," Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Darrell Issa wrote in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder yesterday. "We request that you immediately remove Ms. Bosserman from the ongoing investigation."

Nice points certainly, but I'm sorry Chairman Issa, that's just not enough. Your 'stern' letters have led to nothing in multiple offenses of this scandal-ridden administration. It's time for action.

Your next letter should be to the Speaker of the House demanding a Special Prosecutor be named since this administration and Congress is incapable of investigating anything.

[Oak Grove]

Representative Issa is a Showboat.

He holds hearing on sensational subjects, postures for the Press, shamelessly promotes himself......and does NOTHING.

Absolutely nothing.

Issa is not a conservative and is not effective.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Indeed. Another “non-partisan” investigation here.

[scooby321]

Did we almost impeach a President who used the IRS against his Political opponents?

[MrB]

I think Nixon only shouted something about doing it in a moment of anger.
He never actually ordered it.

In the case of Obama, he wouldn’t have to order it done.
It was understood that if they did it (and they wanted to, being political partisans), that they would be covered by this admin.

I believe there were several lines in the Declaration that could apply to this behavior by the current government.

[logic101.net]

Isn’t everyone an Obama and DNC donor? Well, if you pay taxes you are. It gets funneled through the public sector unions.

But anyway, did anyone really think there would be a Republican or tea party type doing this investigation?

[tennmountainman]

Not a word from Bonehead, Cantor, McConnell and McCarthy about
this hack appointment. Their silence speaks volumes.

[RobbyS]

Did Nixon actually order the Watergate break in, or even the cover-up?

[MrB]

I think he was involved in the coverup, but not in the ordering of the breakin.

[Don Corleone]

Its the way its done in Chicago!

[Fester Chugabrew]

Is there a non-partisan investigator to be found within the beltway?

[ncfool]

SHOWBOAT IS RIGHT.......

[logic101.net]

Doubt it.

[managusta]

Whoa! hoss. The whole administration is in full non disclosure drill working against him and his committee.
The only recourse to the blocking of information is public communication.
Remember unlike Democrats our side still follows the rules.
Issa is a conservative and fighting to shine the light on the vermin that have invaded our government.
Also recall Reagan’s 11th commandment “Thou shalt not speak ill of your own party.”.
Happy New Year.