Posted on 01/11/2014 7:49:18 AM PST by Kaslin
Since the Constitution makes clear beyond the shadow of a doubt that RECESS appointments can only be made when Congress is officially in RECESS, how could the Supreme Court rule otherwise?
Maybe the Justices are finally tired of being members of a Court that is only ONE of the worst Supreme Courts in history and instead wants to officially secure its place as THE worst Supreme Court in history.
It would be hard for the Roberts Court to displace at the very bottom of the heap the infamous Supreme Court that in the 1850s ruled against Dred Scott, thereby touching off the Civil War.
However, the Roberts Court already has ONE inane and destructive ruling to its discredit — its support of ObamaCare — so a clearly unconstitutional ruling allowing recess appointments to be made when Congress in NOT in recess could provide just the additional weight of injustice necessary to tip the scales in securing the Robert’s Court the prize of worst Supreme Court that America has ever had to endure.
5.56mm
From April 24, 2013 when the case was docketed to January 13, 2014 is less then 9 (nine) month not two years
How does Boeing have standing?
How does Boeing have standing?
Yep - the act will be labeled a "tax" and therefore totally legit, no matter where it originated or what it was called.
How does Boeing have standing?
Boeing was injured when the unconstitutional appointment allowed the NLRB to proceed against Boeing's 777 plant outside Charleston. [Preventing them from opening]
I should have said, "I think," they have standing, because I believe the injury has now been rectified.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.